Genetically Proxied Telomere Length but Not Epigenetic Aging Acceleration Causally Influences Healthspan: A Mendelian Randomization Study
Feng, B.; Yang, R.; Wang, G. R.; Hu, Q.; Zhao, C.
Show abstract
ObjectiveTo assess the causal effects of leukocyte telomere length (TL) and epigenetic age acceleration (EAA) on healthspan. MethodsWe performed two-sample Mendelian randomization (MR) analyses in accordance with STROBE-MR guidelines. Genetic instrumental variables (IVs) for TL and four EAA biomarkers (Hannum, GrimAge, PhenoAge, and intrinsic EAA) were derived from published genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics involving up to 472,174 individuals for TL and approximately 35,000 individuals for each EAA biomarker. GWAS summary statistics for healthspan, defined as age at first diagnosis of any of eight major chronic conditions or death, were obtained from the UK Biobank (N=300,477 unrelated European-ancestry participants). The primary MR estimates were obtained using the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) method, complemented by various sensitivity analyses to assess pleiotropy, instrument heterogeneity, and robustness of causal inference. The strength of the IVs was evaluated using F-statistics, and causal directionality was validated using Steiger filtering. ResultsGenetically predicted longer TL was causally associated with extended healthspan (IVW {beta}=0.106; 95% CI: 0.053-0.159; p=6.9x10-5). The association was robust across multiple sensitivity analyses, with no indication of directional pleiotropy (MR-Egger intercept p=0.47), no influential outliers identified by MR-PRESSO, and consistent causal direction confirmed by Steiger tests. In contrast, none of the four EAA biomarkers demonstrated convincing causal effects on health span (all IVW p-values >0.05), and results were inconsistent across sensitivity analyses, suggesting their role as correlates rather than causal determinants of healthy longevity. ConclusionsThis MR study provides robust evidence supporting a causal role of genetically determined telomere length in extending healthspan, while no such effect was observed for four commonly studied EAA biomarkers. These findings underscore the central role of telomere biology in healthy aging and indicate that telomere maintenance may represent a promising target for interventions aimed at delaying the onset of age-related diseases.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- AnthropoAge, a novel approach to integrate body composition into the estimation of biological age 94%
- Body weight at young adulthood and association with epigenetic aging and lifespan in the BXD murine family 94%
- A novel framework to build saliva-based DNA methylation biomarkers: quantifying systemic chronic inflammation as a case study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of epigenetic and metabolomic biomarkers indicating biological age 95%
- Associations of Loneliness and Social Isolation with Healthspan and Lifespan in the US Health and Retirement Study 95%
- The mediating role of epigenetic clocks underlying educational inequalities in mortality: a multi-cohort study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Novel Blood-Based Epigenetic Clock for Intrinsic Capacity Predicts Mortality and is Associated with Clinical, Immunological and Lifestyle Factors 93%
- Disparities in the pace of biological aging among midlife adults of the same chronological age have implications for future frailty risk and policy 93%
- Multi-omic profiling of primary mouse neutrophils reveals a pattern of sex and age-related functional regulation 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- An integrative study of five biological clocks in somatic and mental health 95%
- Quantification of the pace of biological aging in humans through a blood test: The DunedinPoAm DNA methylation algorithm 94%
- A mathematical model that predicts human biological age from physiological traits identifies environmental and genetic factors that influence aging 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.