Intertransverse process block for chronic postsurgical pain in cardiac surgery: protocol for a double-blinded randomized controlled trial
WONG, H. M. K.; Sivakumar, R. K.; Wong, W. T.; Chan, A. K. M.; Yeung, Z. H. S.; Chen, P. Y.; Tang, S. T. W.; Chu, M. H. M.; Wong, R. H. L.; Ho, K. M.
Show abstract
IntroductionChronic postsurgical pain (CPSP) after cardiac surgery is a significant concern. Despite the known association between acute pain and CPSP, advanced pain management strategies have not reduced its incidence. Preventing CPSP requires optimizing acute pain control and disrupting central sensitization. The side effects and risks associated with chronic use of current opioid-based cardiac anesthesia necessitate the adoption of multimodal analgesia. Regional anesthesia is a promising alternative, though existing techniques in cardiac surgery have notable limitations. The intertransverse process block (ITPB) is a novel regional technique that offers potential somatic and visceral analgesia. Recent studies demonstrate consistent local anesthetic spread to the intercostal, paravertebral, and epidural spaces, suggesting broader pain control. ITPB may provide a simpler, safer approach in cardiac surgery, reducing the risks of pleural puncture and bleeding. We hypothesize that ITPB will improve pain control, quality of recovery, and health-related quality of life, thereby mitigating chronic postsurgical pain. MethodsThis is a single-center, randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled trial with intention-to-treat analysis. Elective patients awaiting coronary artery bypass grafting, with or without valvular repair or replacement, will be recruited. Ninety-six participants will be randomly assigned to either ITPB or control group. The ITPB group will receive bilateral ITPBs with 20 ml 0.25% levobupivacaine on each side at the T4-5 level under ultrasound guidance, administered before anesthesia induction. Sham blocks, with equal volume of normal saline, will be performed in the control group. The primary outcome is the quality of recovery, assessed using the 15-item Quality of Recovery questionnaire, at 24 hours after tracheal extubation. Secondary outcomes include Numerical Rating Scale pain scores, patient satisfaction, and opioid consumption within 72 hours post-extubation, duration of mechanical ventilation, length of stay in the ICU and hospital, and opioid-related side effects. The incidence of CPSP at 3, 6, and 12 months will be measured, along with pain interference via the Brief Pain Inventory and the Short-Form McGill Questionnaire-2. DiscussionCurrent pain management strategies often rely heavily on opioids, which can have significant side effects and may not adequately address chronic postsurgical pain. This study investigates the efficacy of the intertransverse process block, a novel regional anesthesia technique, in reducing both acute and chronic postsurgical pain in cardiac surgery. Randomized controlled trials on intertransverse process block in cardiac surgery are limited. The results of this study will help define the role of intertransverse process block in reducing chronic postsurgical pain in cardiac surgical population. Clinical trial registrationThis trial has been prospectively registered at http://clinicaltrials.gov: NCT06946290
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Telemedicine Support for Intraoperative Anaesthesia Care on Postoperative Outcomes: The TECTONICS Randomised Clinical Trial 93%
- The impact of female sex on anaesthetic awareness, depth and emergence: A systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Predicting Post-operative Pain in Lung Cancer Patients using Pre-operative Peak Alpha Frequency 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- S-ketamine in patient-controlled analgesia with oxycodone improves analgesia in a dose-dependent manner after major lumbar fusion surgery: a randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled clinical trial 98%
- Virtual reality as a strategy for intra-operatory anxiolysis and pharmacological sparing in patients undergoing breast surgeries: the V-RAPS randomized controlled trial protocol 96%
- Association between epidural catheter tip malposition and anesthesiologists’ experience after graduation: a cross-sectional study using postoperative CT images 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hydrocortisone for the prevention of postoperative delirium in digestive surgery (HyPOD): Study protocol for a multicentre randomized, blind, placebo-controlled trial 96%
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 96%
- Guided relaxation-based virtual reality versus distraction-based virtual reality or passive control for postoperative pain management in children and adolescents undergoing Nuss repair of pectus excavatum: protocol for a prospective, randomized, controlled trial (FOREVR Peds trial) 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effectiveness of acupuncture point stimulation for the prevention of post-operative sore throat: a meta-analysis. 93%
- Risk Factor Stratification for Postoperative Delirium: A Retrospective Database Study 93%
- Combination therapy of Tocilizumab and steroid for management of COVID-19 associated cytokine release syndrome: A single center experience from Pune, Western India 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of Virtually Led Value-Based Preoperative Assessment on Safety, Efficiency, and Patient and Professional Satisfaction 93%
- Rehabilitation with and without Robot and Allied Digital Technologies (RADTs) in stroke patients: a study protocol for a multicentre Randomised Controlled Trial on the effectiveness, acceptability, usability, and economic-organizational sustainability of RADTs from subacute to chronic phase (STROKEFIT4) 92%
- Changes in back pain scores after bariatric surgery in obese patients: A systematic review and meta-analysis 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.