Professional Identity at the Crossroads: Italian Healthcare Technologists navigating Technology and Human Care
Salvatori, I.; Mortari, L.; Silva, R.
Show abstract
Healthcare Technologists (HTs) represent a crucial yet understudied group within modern healthcare systems. Operating at the intersection of advanced technologies and patient care, HTs face the dual challenge of mastering complex technical procedures while sustaining ethically grounded, relational engagement. This study investigates how professional identity is constructed within HT education in Italy, combining conceptual analysis and empirical data. Drawing on the philosophy of technology and theories of professional identity, the research critiques the traditional technocentric orientation of HT training and advocates for pedagogical models that integrate emotional, ethical, and reflective dimensions. The empirical component includes 55 semi-structured interviews with 40 HT educators (clinical tutors and adjunct lecturers) and 15 undergraduate students from various HTs academic programs. Using inductive content analysis, the study identifies four macro-categories shaping professional identity: career motivation and background; identity-building processes; relational and ethical values; and educational strategies. Participants describe identity formation as a dynamic, reflective process shaped by real-world practice, relational interactions, and motivational drivers. Both students and educators emphasize the hybrid nature of their role, blending technical mastery with interpersonal care. Relational competence, adaptability, and a commitment to quality emerge as defining features. The study highlights systemic challenges, including limited recognition of HTs roles, pedagogical challenges for educators, and documents strong intrinsic motivations and ethical commitment among participants. HT educators express the need for greater support in transitioning from clinical to teaching roles, and students reveal a desire for more hands-on and reflective learning experiences. This research contributes a conceptual and practical framework for rethinking HTs education, embedding humanistic, ethical, and relational competencies into curricula. It positions HTs not as peripheral technicians, but as integral professionals in technologically mediated, patient-centered care systems.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
- Nurses’ experience of using video consultation in a digital care setting and its impact on their workflow and communication 96%
- Evaluating user experience with immersive technology in simulation-based education: a modified Delphi study with qualitative analysis 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 95%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 94%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Adverse event reviews in healthcare: What matters to patients and their family? A qualitative study exploring the perspective of patients and family 95%
- Occupational challenges of health care workers during the COVID-19 pandemic. A qualitative study 95%
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 95%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Benefits and Challenges of Using Virtual Primary Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: From Key Lessons to a Framework for Implementation 95%
- Theory of radiologist interaction with instant messaging decision support tools: a sequential-explanatory study 95%
- Exploring perspectives on digital smoking cessation just-in-time adaptive interventions: A focus group study with adult smokers and smoking cessation professionals 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.