Back

Free-Living Hip Accelerometry Predicts Frailty Status and 12-Month Frailty Decline in Older Adults

Kramer, B.; Long, Y.; Pagan, M.; Brown, S.; Rzhetsky, A.; Huisingh-Scheetz, M.

2025-07-10 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2025.07.09.25330372 medRxiv
Show abstract

Frailty is a clinical syndrome in older adults characterized by heightened vulnerability to adverse outcomes, yet it remains under-assessed in routine practice due to time-intensive evaluation methods. Wearable accelerometers offer a promising approach for passive, continuous frailty monitoring. We analyzed data from 151 community-dwelling older adults ([≥]65 years) in the FACE Aging Study who wore hip accelerometers for seven days. Machine learning models were developed to classify baseline frailty status using an adapted frailty phenotype and predict 12-month frailty decline. Features derived from accelerometry data included sleep patterns, activity levels, sedentary behavior, and circadian rhythms. Multiple algorithms were compared, including deep neural networks (ResNet), gradient boosting machines (LightGBM, XGBoost, CatBoost), and multilayer perceptrons (MLPs). For baseline frailty classification, LightGBM achieved the highest performance with an F1 score of 0.898, precision of 0.815, perfect recall (1.000), and AUROC of 0.887. For predicting 12-month frailty decline, multilayer perceptron performed best with an F1 score of 0.812, precision of 0.891, and recall of 0.746. Key predictive features included low overall activity, high sedentary behavior, fragmented activity patterns, and poor sleep quality, which aligned with established frailty phenotypes. One week of free-living hip accelerometry data can accurately identify current frailty status and predict short-term frailty progression in older adults. These findings support the feasibility of developing automated, scalable frailty screening tools that could enable proactive interventions and transform geriatric care from reactive to preventive approaches. External validation in larger, diverse populations is needed to confirm generalizability.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
22.1%
2
Sensors
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
3
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
8.3%
4
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.1%
5
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.2%
7
Frontiers in Physiology
93 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
4.3%
8
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.5%
9
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 42%
3.0%
10
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.7%
11
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.4%
12
BMC Geriatrics
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.0%
13
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
13 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
14
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.9%
15
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 52%
1.8%
16
npj Digital Medicine
97 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
17
Alzheimer's & Dementia
143 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
19
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.9%
20
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.9%
21
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.9%
22
Nature Medicine
117 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
23
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.7%
24
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.7%
25
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 60%
0.7%
26
Biology Methods and Protocols
53 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
27
The Journal of Prevention of Alzheimer's Disease
10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%
28
Computer Methods and Programs in Biomedicine
27 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%