Back

Maternal high-fat/high-sugar diet has short-term dental effects and long-term sex-specific skeletal effects on adult offspring mice

Hassan, M.; Koester, K.; Harasymowicz, N.; Oestreich, A. K.; Moley, K.; Guilak, F.; Scheller, E. L.

2025-07-10 developmental biology
10.1101/2025.07.06.663396 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundMaternal nutrition is increasingly recognized as a modulator of offspring skeletal development. While genetics has long been considered the primary determinant of craniofacial morphology, emerging evidence suggests that prenatal and early postnatal dietary exposures also influence facial morphology. However, how maternal diet differentially affects male and female craniofacial structures remains unclear. This study aimed to examine the effects of a maternal high-fat, high-sugar (HFHS) diet on craniofacial and dental morphology in first-(F1) and second-(F2) generation adult mice. Materials and MethodsFemale mice were fed a HFHS diet for six weeks before mating and throughout pregnancy and lactation. F1 offspring were weaned to a standard chow diet, and a subset of female F1 offspring were bred to produce F2 offspring, also maintained on chow. Craniofacial skeletal and dental structures of adult F1 and F2 mice at 1-year of age were assessed using micro-computed tomography for linear and geometric morphometrics. ResultsHFHS diet exposure significantly reduced midfacial and mandibular length in F1 females, and these effects persisted in F2 females. Mandibular shape differences were also observed in both generations of females. In males, skull size remained unchanged, though subtle mandibular shape changes were noted in F1 only. Tooth size was reduced in both sexes of F1 offspring but not in F2. ConclusionMaternal HFHS diet induces sex- and jaw-specific alterations in craniofacial morphology, with skeletal changes persisting in females across generations, while dental effects did not persist beyond one generation. These findings highlight the potential for maternal dietary habits to exert lasting, intergenerational influences on offspring facial form.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Developmental Dynamics
56 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.0%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 8%
7.4%
3
JBMR Plus
18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.8%
4
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 26%
6.4%
5
Bone
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.4%
50% of probability mass above
6
Journal of Bone and Mineral Research
35 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
3.5%
7
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 33%
3.3%
8
Developmental Biology
150 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.8%
9
Development
497 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.8%
10
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.8%
11
Journal of Anatomy
29 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
12
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.5%
13
Aging
75 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
14
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
15
Nutrients
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.4%
16
The Journal of Nutrition
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Biochemical and Biophysical Research Communications
84 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
18
Toxicology and Applied Pharmacology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.0%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 29%
1.0%
20
Hormones and Behavior
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Disease Models & Mechanisms
119 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Physiology
106 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
23
Genes, Brain and Behavior
30 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
24
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences
2444 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.9%
25
Frontiers in Endocrinology
58 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
26
The American Journal of Clinical Nutrition
19 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.6%
27
Developmental Psychobiology
10 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%