Back

The Effects of COgNitive Training in Community-dwelling Older Adults at High Risk for demENTia (CONTENT): study protocol of two double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials

Pan, Y.; Ji, M.; Liang, J.; Ma, J.; Zhang, W.; Liu, Y.; Dai, Y.; Gao, D.; Zhang, Y.; Xie, W.; Zheng, F.

2025-06-27 geriatric medicine
10.1101/2025.06.27.25330394
Show abstract

IntroductionDementia contributes to the disease burden worldwide, and people with hypertension or type 2 diabetes are associated with an elevated risk of developing dementia. It is essential to prevent or delay cognitive decline in people at high risk within the community. Our trials aim to evaluate the effects of adaptive cognitive training on community-dwelling older adults with hypertension or type 2 diabetes but no dementia. Method and analysisTwo multicenter, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials, named COgNitive Training in community-dwelling older adults at high risk for demENTia and with Hypertension (CONTENT-Hypertension) and COgNitive Training in community-dwelling older adults at high risk for demENTia and with Diabetes (CONTENT-Diabetes), will be conducted to investigate the effects of adaptive cognitive training on participants aged 60 years or above who have been diagnosed with hypertension or type 2 diabetes but no dementia. Each trial will enroll 120 participants. Participants will be recruited from local community in Shijingshan and Haidian District, Beijing, and allocated to either the intervention or control group using a 1:1 ratio. The intervention group will engage in 12 weeks of adaptive cognitive training, while the control group will receive 12 weeks of placebo cognitive training. A 24-week follow-up assessment will be conducted for all participants to evaluate the persistency of the effects. The primary outcome is the 12-week change in Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA) Basic scores from baseline to the end of the intervention (12 weeks). Secondary outcomes include 6-week and 24-week changes in the MoCA from baseline; 6-week, 12-week, and 24-week changes in Trail Making Test-A&B (TMT-A, TMT-B), Digit Symbol Substitution Test (DSST), the World Health Organization/University of California at Los Angeles Auditory Verbal Learning Test (WHO-UCLA AVLT), and Boston naming test (BNT) scores of cognitive functions; 6-week and 12-week changes in Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS), Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7), Pittsburgh sleep quality index (PSQI); and 12-week change in blood pressure (CONTENT-Hypertension) or fasting blood glucose and HbA1c (CONTENT-Diabetes) from baseline. Ethics and disseminationThis study will adhere to the ethical principles outlined in the Declaration of Helsinki and comply with international standards for Good Clinical Practice (GCP). All participants will sign the informed consent at baseline. This study has been approved by the Ethics Committee of Plastic Surgery Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences & Peking Union Medical College (approval numbers: 2023-139 and 2024-162). The findings of the trials will be disseminated through publications in peer-reviewed scientific journals and presented at academic conferences. Trial registration numbersNCT06512922 and NCT06524388. STRENGTHS AND LIMITATIONS OF THIS STUDYO_LIBoth trials are double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trials to investigate the effects of adaptive cognitive training among patients with hypertension or type 2 diabetes but no dementia. The rigorous randomized control trial design can ensure the reliability and efficacy of the trial. C_LIO_LIAdaptive cognitive training will automatically target the most impaired cognitive domains (domain-adaptive). The difficulty of cognitive training tasks will upgrade to the next level once the participants reach a high accuracy of 80% (difficulty-adaptive), which enables targeted and efficient training. C_LIO_LIThe use of placebo cognitive training can reduce the impact of the placebo effect on the results. C_LIO_LIAll training will be conducted remotely, allowing participants to complete the program from their homes to increase convenience and participant compliance. C_LI

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
based on 1737 papers
Top 15%
21.9%
2
BMJ Open
based on 553 papers
Top 5%
17.1%
3
Alzheimer's & Dementia
based on 84 papers
Top 2%
6.5%
4
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
based on 11 papers
Top 0.1%
5.2%
50% of probability mass above
5
GeroScience
based on 22 papers
Top 0.6%
2.7%
6
Journal of the American Medical Directors Association
based on 12 papers
Top 0.5%
2.7%
7
BMC Geriatrics
based on 15 papers
Top 0.6%
2.7%
8
Journal of Alzheimer's Disease
based on 31 papers
Top 2%
2.6%
9
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
based on 12 papers
Top 0.4%
2.6%
10
Journal of Clinical Medicine
based on 77 papers
Top 6%
2.6%
11
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
based on 22 papers
Top 1%
2.6%
12
Scientific Reports
based on 701 papers
Top 60%
2.5%
13
BMC Neurology
based on 11 papers
Top 1.0%
2.0%
14
Pilot and Feasibility Studies
based on 12 papers
Top 0.4%
2.0%
15
Cureus
based on 64 papers
Top 11%
1.5%
16
Aging
based on 18 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
17
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
1.5%
18
Frontiers in Public Health
based on 135 papers
Top 20%
1.3%
19
Age and Ageing
based on 27 papers
Top 2%
0.9%
20
Frontiers in Neurology
based on 74 papers
Top 10%
0.9%
21
DIGITAL HEALTH
based on 11 papers
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Biology Methods and Protocols
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
23
Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews
based on 19 papers
Top 3%
0.7%
24
eClinicalMedicine
based on 55 papers
Top 5%
0.7%
25
Brain Sciences
based on 19 papers
Top 2%
0.7%
26
Neurology
based on 38 papers
Top 6%
0.7%
27
Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry
based on 26 papers
Top 5%
0.7%