Back

CpGeneAge: multi-omics aging clocks associated with Nf-κB signaling pathway in aging

Varga, B.; Kerepesi, C.

2025-06-30 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.06.26.661785 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Aging clocks have emerged as the primary tools for measuring biological aging and have been developed for a wide range of single-omic measurements. Epigenetic aging clocks showed high accuracy in age prediction, however, their biological interpretation is still a challenging task. Transcriptomics aging clocks provide better interpretability but worse age prediction accuracy. To exploit the benefits of both omics techniques, the main goal of this study was to develop the first multi-omics aging clocks based on combined epigenetics and transcriptomics features. For this purpose, we utilized a dataset where reduced representation bisulfite sequencing (RRBS) and RNA-seq measurements were measured at the same time for peripheral blood samples of 182 individuals. Then we trained machine learning models (ElasticNet) using the methylation and gene expression features at the same time. While the most accurate models tended to use exclusively methylation features, we were able to develop highly accurate multi-omics aging clocks too (called CpGenAge). Both the canonical and the non-canonical Nf-{kappa}B signaling pathways, with the genes EDA, EDA2R, EDARADD, and CD70, were overrepresented among the gene expression features of the multi-omics aging clocks. The EDARADD, which is a unique hallmark of aging, was represented among both the gene expression and methylation features. By developing single-omic clocks on the same multi-omics dataset, we found that epigenetic age acceleration and transcriptomics age acceleration do not correlate with each other, further supporting the benefits of our multi-omics approach. In summary, here, we demonstrate that multi-omics aging clocks are useful tools to investigate aging and biological age at the multi-omics level.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
38.7%
2
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.7%
3
Aging Cell
144 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
8.6%
50% of probability mass above
4
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
4.1%
5
Neurobiology of Aging
95 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
2.8%
6
Frontiers in Genetics
197 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.8%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 46%
2.5%
8
Briefings in Bioinformatics
326 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.1%
9
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.1%
10
Computational and Structural Biotechnology Journal
216 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.9%
11
Clinical Epigenetics
53 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 56%
1.5%
13
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.1%
14
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
453 papers in training set
Top 14%
0.8%
15
IEEE Journal of Biomedical and Health Informatics
34 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
16
BMC Genomics
328 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.7%
17
Advanced Science
249 papers in training set
Top 21%
0.7%
18
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 27%
0.7%
19
Nature Communications
4913 papers in training set
Top 65%
0.7%
20
Epigenetics
43 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.7%
21
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 61%
0.7%
22
BMC Bioinformatics
383 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%
23
iScience
1063 papers in training set
Top 40%
0.5%
24
Cell Reports
1338 papers in training set
Top 36%
0.5%
25
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.5%