Back

Identifying gaps between scientific and local knowledge in climate change adaptation for northern European agriculture

Blennow, K.; Carlsson, G.; Grenville-Briggs, L. J.; Hansson, P.; Lankinen, A.

2025-06-25 scientific communication and education Community evaluation
10.1101/2025.06.23.661058 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Climate change impacts agriculture in complex and regionally specific ways. In temperate regions such as southern Sweden, it presents both opportunities, such as longer growing seasons, and challenges, including increased drought and heat stress. This study examined how Swedish agriculture is adapting to climate change, using the extreme 2018 drought and heatwave as a critical case to explore both immediate responses and longer-term preparedness in crop production systems. We compared scientific and local knowledge through a systematic scoping review of peer-reviewed literature from northern Europe, a workshop with project scientists, and a participatory workshop with farmers. The study aimed to identify gaps between scientific and local understandings of climate change adaptation, particularly in how extreme events influence decision-making and preparedness. Using a transdisciplinary, problem-feeding approach, we compared how farmers and scientists conceptualise crisis response and long-term adaptation, employing influence diagrams to visualise their understandings. Our review found that much scientific work focuses on short-term coping strategies, such as feed substitution or altered irrigation, while longer-term adaptation remains underexplored. In contrast, farmers emphasized context specific actions grounded in their farm operations, highlighting socio-economic and administrative constraints, whereas scientists tended to propose generalisable technology-oriented strategies. These differences underscore the importance of integrating both experiential and scientific knowledge to co-develop more effective adaptation responses. The study lays the foundation for a targeted, large-scale survey to explore farmer motivations, perceptions of risk and opportunity, and adaptive capacities across diverse contexts. Our findings highlight the need to move beyond reactive measures and investigate anticipatory strategies that foster and enable adaptive capacity. Here we demonstrate that supporting long-term adaptation in agriculture will require inclusive, evidence-based approaches that incorporate perspectives from farmers, advisors, scientists, and public authorities alike.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
35.7%
2
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 20%
8.2%
3
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
5.7%
4
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Veterinary Science
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.5%
6
Ecology and Evolution
267 papers in training set
Top 2%
4.2%
7
Ecological Informatics
33 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.4%
8
Sustainability
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.9%
9
Agriculture, Ecosystems & Environment
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.5%
10
Phytopathology®
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.5%
11
Environmental Research Letters
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.5%
12
Peer Community Journal
281 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
Wellcome Open Research
67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.4%
14
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 7%
1.2%
15
Animals
23 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.1%
16
Pest Management Science
36 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.1%
17
Nature Communications
5641 papers in training set
Top 53%
1.0%
18
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 69%
1.0%
19
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
59 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.0%
20
Environmental and Experimental Botany
12 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
21
Frontiers in Psychology
56 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
22
Plant and Soil
18 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
23
Frontiers in Plant Science
256 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.6%
24
Royal Society Open Science
214 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
25
Journal of Environmental Management
13 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Public Health
148 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.5%
27
F1000Research
88 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
28
BMC Public Health
158 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%