A systematic review of Nature-based interventions for neurological disorders
Kovaleski, C.; Ahmed, N.; Huckle, C.; Bashford, J.
Show abstract
The human nervous system evolved to optimise its interactions with the natural world. However, as civilisations over recent millennia have developed, the human brain has become steadily disconnected from these natural stimuli. Consequently, detrimental effects on individual health are increasingly recognised. Strategies that promote reconnection with Nature have yielded significant gains when it comes to psychological and general physical health, although much less is known about their direct impact on neurological health. In this systematic review, we identified 17 studies that assessed at least one Nature-based intervention to treat any neurological disease. The predominant study design was quasi-experimental (n=9). Interventions included horticultural therapy, petal arranging and farm visits. The majority of studies had a moderate risk of bias. While 88% (n=15) of studies reported improvements in measures such as quality of life, mood, agitation, apathy or cognitive function, there was such an overrepresentation of studies recruiting patients with dementia (94%; n=16) that for many common neurological disorders, including epilepsy, migraine and multiple sclerosis, the current literature leaves us none the wiser. Considering the extensive crosstalk that exists between physical and psychological disease, we argue that the potential benefit of formal Nature Prescriptions as an accessible, cheap and harmless endorsement of Mother Natures healing hand warrants greater attention in neurology. Indeed, this aligns with the wider societal and environmental need for humans to reconnect with the natural world.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- The neuroprotective effects of estrogen and estrogenic compounds in spinal cord injury 89%
- A Systematic Review of the Quantitative markers of speech and language of the Frontotemporal Degeneration Spectrum and their potential for cross-linguistic implementation 88%
- From smartphone data to clinically relevant predictions: A systematic review of digital phenotyping methods in depression 87%
Similar papers in this journal
- Factors influencing the effectiveness of nature–based Interventions (NBIs) aimed at improving mental health and wellbeing: Protocol of an umbrella review 95%
- Psychotherapies and Psychological Support for Individuals Facing Psychological Distress during the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Scoping Review 92%
- Modelling the impact of behavioural interventions during pandemics: A systematic review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- A randomized sham-controlled trial of transcranial and intranasal photobiomodulation in Japanese patients with mild cognitive impairment and mild dementia due to Alzhimer’s disease: a protocol 90%
- Behavioral Effects in Disorders of Consciousness Following Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials 90%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Digital game-based interventions for cognitive training in healthy adults and adults with cognitive impairment: Protocol for a two-part systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- International Prevalence Of Consultation With A Naturopathic Practitioner: A Systematic Review And Meta-Analysis 91%
- Strategies used to manage overlap of primary study data by exercise-related overviews. Protocol for a systematic methodological review 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of galvanic vestibular stimulation on postural balance in Parkinson’s Disease: A systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
- Comparative Efficacy and Safety of Tenecteplase and Alteplase in Acute Ischemic Stroke: A Pairwise and Network Meta-analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials 87%
- Improving Care for Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis with Artificial Intelligence and Affective Computing 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.