Safety and Efficacy of Anti-Fungal agents in Cholangiocarcinoma Patients: A Multi-Center Retrospective Case-Controlled Study
Samadder, S.
Show abstract
BackgroundComorbid conditions in cancer patients arising from coinfections are one of the main risks of mortality. Recurrent infections are well-known for reducing quality of life in cancer patients. Long-term efficacy of anti-fungal and anti-bacterial agents for drug repositioning is of great importance. In this longitudinal study long term risk and benefits of anti-fungal plus anti-bacterial agents are compared to anti-bacterial agents. MethodsIn this multi-center study, patients (n = 3048) diagnosed with cholangiocarcinoma from 1st January 2010 to 1st January 2021 at Severance hospital were analyzed. All patients (n = 983) received standard therapy were included, post propensity score matching (n = 153) patients were included in arm-A treated with anti-bacterial plus anti-fungal agents and (n = 153) in arm-B treated with anti-bacterial agents. Using cox-proportional hazard model, and random forest analyses, efficacy of antimicrobials prescribed during cancer treatment. Post-chemotherapy and post-diagnosis survival in infected were compared among groups. Lastly post infection end-stage leukopenia and leukocytosis events 30 days prior to death were compared. ResultsIn this study total (n = 306) cholangiocarcinoma patients were included post propensity score matching. There is no significant difference in mean days survived post-cancer diagnosis 712 days (95% CI 605 - 818) arm-A and 615 days (95% CI 536 - 693) survived by arm-B with (p-value 0.15). During chemotherapy antibiotic treated arm-A patients survived mean 896 days (95% CI 568 - 1223) compared to arm-B 622 days (95% CI 501 - 742) with p-value 0.05. Significant statistical difference in end-stage mortality caused by chemotherapy induced co-infection and leukopenia were found higher in arm-A (14%) compared to arm-B (3%) with (p-value 0.05). Post exposure to anti-fungals hazard ratio of fluconazole (n = 113) users compared to non-users (n = 40) of arm-A patients were 1.391 (0.994 - 1.949) with p-value 0.07. Hazard ratio of arm-A fluconazole user Vs arm-B teicoplanin treated patients were 1.027 (0.763 - 1.384) with p-value 0.8. ConclusionPatients co-treated with anti-bacterial and anti-fungal agents during chemotherapy survived significantly longer compared to patients treated with anti-bacterial agents alone. Co-treated patients experienced more leukopenia than patients treated with anti-bacterial drugs 8 days prior to death. Mortalities post fluconazole or teicoplanin exposure suggested end-stage fungal or bacterial infections were fatal.
Matching journals
The top 10 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Characteristics and outcome profile of Hospitalized African COVID-19 patients: The Ethiopian Context 94%
- A novel small molecule LLL12B inhibits STAT3 signaling and sensitizes ovarian cancer cell to paclitaxel and cisplatin 94%
- Laboratory Biomarkers of COVID-19 Disease Severity and Outcome: Findings from a Developing Country 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determinants of Developing Symptomatic Disease in Ethiopian COVID-19 Patients 93%
- Evaluation of the disease outcome in Covid-19 infected patients by disease symptoms: a retrospective cross-sectional study in Ilam Province, Iran 93%
- 2-Deoxy-D-Glucose as an Adjunct to Standard of Care in the Medical Management of COVID-19: A Proof-of-Concept & Dose-Ranging Randomised Clinical Trial 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparative assessment of the effects of bumped kinase inhibitors on early zebrafish embryo development and pregnancy in mice. 90%
- Serum Concentration of Continuously administered Vancomycin influences Efficacy and Safety in Critically Ill Adults: A Systematic Review 90%
- Hydroxychloroquine and Azithromycin as a treatment of COVID-19: preliminary results of an open-label non-randomized clinical trial 90%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.