Estimating Excess Mortality Among People Living with HIV/AIDS During the COVID-19 Pandemic in the USA
Hall, L.; Chowell, G.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTo quantify the all-cause excess death rate of people living with HIV/AIDS (PWHA) during the multi-year 2020-2022 COVID-19 pandemic in the United States (U.S.), including stratifications by sex, age, race/ethnicity, and region. DesignUsing publicly available data from the CDC NCHHSTP AtlasPlus dashboard, we employed the ensemble n-subepidemic modeling framework (SubEpiPredict toolbox). This dynamic, uncertainty-aware approach was used to generate counterfactual forecasts of U.S. deaths among PWHA for 2020-2022. MethodsThe models were calibrated using 12 years of pre-pandemic mortality trends (2008-2019), with the median excess death rate calculated as the difference between forecasted and observed death rates. Results were stratified by age, sex, race/ethnicity, and U.S. region. ResultsOverall excess mortality among PWHA was estimated at 7,783 crude excess deaths (95% prediction interval [PI]: 5,098-10,525), corresponding to 2.77 excess deaths per 100,000 people (95% PI: 1.81-3.75), with the largest burden observed in 2021. Excess death rates were highest among males (3.39), individuals aged 55-64 years (4.94), multiracial populations (12.82), and residents of the Northeast U.S. (4.12). In contrast, the largest absolute number of excess deaths occurred among males (4,692), adults aged 65 years and older (2,560), Black/African American individuals (3,969), and residents of the Southern U.S. (4,025). ConclusionsThese systematic, model-based results reveal stark heterogeneities among PWHA by exposing recent mortality patterns that may not be captured by disease-specific mortality reporting alone. These heterogeneous findings can inform future public health programming and resource allocation and support tailored interventions for vulnerable populations.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- National HIV testing and diagnosis coverage in sub-Saharan Africa: a new modeling tool for estimating the \"first 90\" from program and survey data 94%
- COVID-related Excess Missed HIV Diagnoses in the United States in 2021: Follow-up to 2020 93%
- Understanding the pathways leading to socioeconomic inequalities in HIV testing uptake in 18 sub-Saharan African countries: a mediation analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Risks and Benefits of Providing HIV Services during the COVID-19 Pandemic 94%
- Joint modeling HIV and HPV using a new hybrid agent-based network and compartmental simulation technique 93%
- A causal inference approach for estimating effects of non-pharmaceutical interventions during Covid-19 pandemic 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Mortality among persons with HIV in the United States during the COVID-19 pandemic: a population-level analysis 94%
- Population Impact and Efficiency of Improvements to HIV PrEP Under Conditions of High ART Coverage among San Francisco Men Who Have Sex with Men 93%
- Quantifying delay in first contact with HIV programs among young women engaged in sex work in Mombasa, Kenya: a time-to-event analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Projected Impact of Concurrently Available Long-Acting Injectable and Daily-Oral HIV Pre-Exposure Prophylaxis: A Mathematical Model 91%
- Projected HIV and Bacterial STI Incidence Following COVID-Related Sexual Distancing and Clinical Service Interruption 91%
- Estimated population-level impact of pneumococcal conjugate vaccines against all-cause pneumonia mortality among unvaccinated age groups in five Latin American countries 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Uncovering clinical risk factors and prediction of severe COVID-19: A machine learning approach based on UK Biobank data 92%
- Dying From COVID-19 or With COVID-19: A Definitive Answer Through a Retrospective Analysis of Mortality in Italy 91%
- Estimating COVID-19 Hospitalizations in the United States with surveillance data using a Bayesian Hierarchical model 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.