Back

Diminished and altered cellular senescence response in delayed wound healing of aging

Shvedova, M.; Thanapaul, R. J. R. S.; Wang, Q.; Shin, G. H.; Dhillon, J.; Roh, D. S.

2025-06-09 cell biology
10.1101/2025.06.08.658533 bioRxiv
Show abstract

The transient upregulation of cellular senescence within wound tissues has been demonstrated to be an important biological process facilitating efficient tissue repair. Dysregulation of this transient wound-induced senescence-like response can result in impaired healing outcomes. Given the established age-related decline in tissue regenerative capacity, we hypothesized that alterations in this senescence response contribute to the delayed healing of cutaneous wounds in aged individuals. Our investigation demonstrated a significant delay in the closure of full-thickness dorsal skin wounds in aged mice compared to their young counterparts. Analysis of the wound microenvironment revealed a transient upregulation of senescence-associated markers (p16, p21, senescence-associated {beta}-galactosidase) and senescence-associated secretory phenotype factors in the wound tissue of young mice, a response that was markedly attenuated in aged mice. Single-cell RNA sequencing analysis of all cells isolated from day 6 wounds identified a distinct population of p16+/p21+/Ki67- senescent fibroblasts in young mice, characterized by a transcriptional signature indicative of pro-healing extracellular matrix production, a finding corroborated in human wound tissue from young donors. Crucially, in aged wounds, we observed a lower quantity of these senescent cells, a deficit compounded by a qualitative, age-dependent shift in their function, moving away from beneficial extracellular matrix remodeling towards a more detrimental pro-inflammatory state, which ultimately can contribute to the delayed wound healing.

Published in Aging Cell (predicted rank #1) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.