Back

The Oxford Visual Perception Screen detects visual perception difficulties in sub-acute adult stroke survivors: a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study.

Cowen, K.; Tabone, F.; Webb, S. S.; Kusec, A.; DaSilva, R.; Thomas, R.; Demeyere, N.; Shaw, L.; Vancleef, K.

2025-06-04 neurology
10.1101/2025.06.04.25328952 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundPost-stroke visual perception difficulties are common, though not always screened for given limited time and available assessments. The aim is to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of a new short assessment, the Oxford Visual Perception Screen (OxVPS) which has been developed to support clinicians in standardised assessment of visual perception difficulties in line with clinical guidelines. MethodsIn a cross-sectional prospective study, stroke survivors were recruited across three subacute rehabilitation units in the United Kingdom between June 2023 and March 2024. Inclusion criteria were 18 years and older, diagnosis of stroke within six weeks, able to concentrate for 15 minutes, and understand simple English instructions. Participants completed the index test, OxVPS, and reference standard, the Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery (RPAB) within two weeks. Diagnostic accuracy was determined via a Receiver Operator Curve analysis of complete cases which included estimation of the Area Under the Curve (AUC) and of sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off point (Youden Index J). A secondary analysis was performed on all cases in which missing data were replaced by random forest imputations. Completion time and rate were compared with a t-test and Wilcoxon test. ResultsThe AUC for complete cases (n=33) was estimated at 0.83 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.68 to 0.98. At the optimal OxVPS cut-off point of 2, sensitivity was estimated at 85% (95% CI: 0.54-1) and specificity at 77% (95% CI: 0.54-1). The analysis on all data (n=62) estimated AUC at 0.88 (95% CI=0.80-0.96), sensitivity at 87% (95% CI=0.62-1) and specificity at 80% (95% CI=0.67-1). A shorter completion time (13 min, t(32)=-20.08, p<0.001) and higher completion rate (97%, V=118, p=0.03) of OxVPS compared to RPAB. ConclusionsOur results indicate that OxVPS is a time-efficient assessment suitable for time-limited clinical settings that can correctly identify stroke survivors with and without visual perception difficulties.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.