The Oxford Visual Perception Screen detects visual perception difficulties in sub-acute adult stroke survivors: a cross-sectional diagnostic accuracy study.
Cowen, K.; Tabone, F.; Webb, S. S.; Kusec, A.; DaSilva, R.; Thomas, R.; Demeyere, N.; Shaw, L.; Vancleef, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundPost-stroke visual perception difficulties are common, though not always screened for given limited time and available assessments. The aim is to evaluate diagnostic accuracy of a new short assessment, the Oxford Visual Perception Screen (OxVPS) which has been developed to support clinicians in standardised assessment of visual perception difficulties in line with clinical guidelines. MethodsIn a cross-sectional prospective study, stroke survivors were recruited across three subacute rehabilitation units in the United Kingdom between June 2023 and March 2024. Inclusion criteria were 18 years and older, diagnosis of stroke within six weeks, able to concentrate for 15 minutes, and understand simple English instructions. Participants completed the index test, OxVPS, and reference standard, the Rivermead Perceptual Assessment Battery (RPAB) within two weeks. Diagnostic accuracy was determined via a Receiver Operator Curve analysis of complete cases which included estimation of the Area Under the Curve (AUC) and of sensitivity and specificity at the optimal cut-off point (Youden Index J). A secondary analysis was performed on all cases in which missing data were replaced by random forest imputations. Completion time and rate were compared with a t-test and Wilcoxon test. ResultsThe AUC for complete cases (n=33) was estimated at 0.83 with a 95% confidence interval ranging from 0.68 to 0.98. At the optimal OxVPS cut-off point of 2, sensitivity was estimated at 85% (95% CI: 0.54-1) and specificity at 77% (95% CI: 0.54-1). The analysis on all data (n=62) estimated AUC at 0.88 (95% CI=0.80-0.96), sensitivity at 87% (95% CI=0.62-1) and specificity at 80% (95% CI=0.67-1). A shorter completion time (13 min, t(32)=-20.08, p<0.001) and higher completion rate (97%, V=118, p=0.03) of OxVPS compared to RPAB. ConclusionsOur results indicate that OxVPS is a time-efficient assessment suitable for time-limited clinical settings that can correctly identify stroke survivors with and without visual perception difficulties.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Considerations for ensuring safety during telerehabilitation of people with stroke. A protocol for a scoping review 94%
- Self-Rehabilitation Strategy for Rural Community-dwelling Stroke Survivors in a Lower-Middle Income Country: A Delphi Study 93%
- The whole day matters after stroke: Study protocol for a randomized controlled trial investigating the effect of a 'sit less, move more, sleep better program early after stroke 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Rasch validation of a new scale to measure dependency in arm use in daily life: the Upper Limb Lucerne ICF-based Multidisciplinary Observation Scale (UL-LIMOS) 96%
- Impaired everyday executive functions and cognitive strategy use on the Weekly Calendar Planning Activity in individuals with stroke undergoing acute inpatient rehabilitation 96%
- Motivational Strategies for Stroke Rehabilitation: A Descriptive Cross-sectional Study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness and Cost-Effectiveness of TeleStroke Consultations to Support the Care of Stroke Patients Presenting to Regional Emergency Departments in Western Australia: An Economic Evaluation Case Study Protocol 93%
- Validation of the German version of the Life-Space Assessment LSA-D 92%
- Prevalence and causes of vision impairment in Norwest Portugal: a capture and recapture study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Current Practice and Challenges in Screening for Visual Perception Deficits after Stroke: a Qualitative Study 96%
- Physiotherapists’ use of aerobic exercise during stroke rehabilitation: a qualitative study using chart-stimulated recall 94%
- Validation of the Mayo-Portland Adaptability Inventory-4 (MPAI-4) and reference norms in a French-Canadian population with traumatic brain injury receiving rehabilitation 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.