Back

Weight-Adjusted Waist Index and Its Association with Pulmonary Function in Children: 6-17 Years: Cross-Sectional Findings

liang, g.; zhai, w.; yang, x.; Cheng, J.; zhou, y.; zhou, j.

2025-06-05 health systems and quality improvement
10.1101/2025.06.03.25328930 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundExcess adiposity has been linked to compromised lung function and elevated susceptibility to respiratory diseases which may lead to long-term lung deterioration. Conventional indicators of obesity, such as BMI and waist circumference, have limitations due to the so-called "obesity paradox." The Weight-Adjusted Waist Index (WWI) is another way to assess central fat distribution. However, its relationship with lung function in children has not been explored to date. ObjectiveTo explore the correlation between WWI and lung function parameters among children aged 6 to 17. MethodsData from NHANES 2007-2012 were used for cross-sectional analysis. An adjusted multivariate regression framework weighted by the inclusion sample was used to assess the relationship between WWI and pulmonary function indices (FVC, FEV1, FEF25% -75%, PEF, and FEV1/FVC). Possible nonlinear relationship was assessed using curve fitting and split linear regression. Subgroup analyses were performed to assess differences between groups. ResultsThis study involved 3,717 US children. Higher WWI was associated with lower FVC, FEV1, FEV1 25%-75% and PEF ({beta} = -0.28, -0.26, -0.30, -0.30, -0.30, and -0.58). The association between FEV1/FEVC and WWI was nearly significant ({beta} = -0.06, P = 0.054). The breakpoints for nonlinear associations were 10.83, 10.70, 10.70, 11, and 10.79 (P < 0.001). Subgroup analyses showed stronger correlations for boys and L-shaped correlations for boys. ConclusionA nonlinear negative correlation between WWI and respiratory capacity metrics was found in US children, emphasizing the potential relevance of maintaining optimal WWI to respiratory health. Prospective cohort studies are warranted to validate these preliminary observations.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 1%
39.1%
2
Frontiers in Pediatrics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
15.2%
50% of probability mass above
3
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 7%
2.8%
4
BMJ Open Respiratory Research
32 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.7%
5
Nutrients
64 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
2.4%
6
Cancers
200 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.1%
7
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 52%
2.0%
8
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.8%
9
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.8%
10
Pediatric Pulmonology
14 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
American Journal of Respiratory and Critical Care Medicine
39 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.7%
12
Environment International
42 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
13
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 6%
1.1%
14
ERJ Open Research
44 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.1%
15
Obesity
19 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
16
Emergency Medicine Journal
20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.1%
17
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.0%
18
Swiss Medical Weekly
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.9%
19
Metabolism
14 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
0.9%
20
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
21
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
22
Frontiers in Digital Health
20 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.9%
23
The American Journal of Tropical Medicine and Hygiene
60 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
24
JAMA Network Open
127 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.7%
25
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
26
BMJ Global Health
98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
27
Frontiers in Nutrition
23 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.5%