Phenotypic and transcriptomic characterization of bicalutamide and enzalutamide resistance in castration-resistant prostate cancer cells
Natkin, R.; Paloneva, M. I.; Raittinen, P. V.; Syvala, H.; Blauer, M.; Tammela, T. L.; Ilmonen, P.; Nykter, M.; Siltari, A.; Murtola, T. J.
Show abstract
The cornerstone treatment for aggressive prostate cancer (PCa) is androgen deprivation therapy (ADT). Eventually PCa cells develop castration resistance, i.e. resistance to ADT. Castration resistant PCa initially responds to androgen signaling inhibitors such as bicalutamide and enzalutamide, but the cells become resistant to these drugs as well overtime. We used long-term cell cultures to create testosterone-dependent, testosterone-independent (CT), bicalutamide-resistant (BR), enzalutamide-resistant (ER), and sequential resistant BR-ER VCaP cell lines to investigate transcriptomic and proteomic changes during the development of drug resistance. Phenotypical changes were evaluated based on cellular morphology and sensitivity to docetaxel. We observed marked changes in transcriptome during the development of drug resistance and differences between ER and sequential BRER. Androgen response and fatty acid metabolism were upregulated in both ER and BRER. MYC target hallmarks were positively enriched only in BRER. Negative regulation of cell death was upregulated in ER while in BRER cell cycle related pathways were upregulated. Direct comparison of ER and BRER revealed androgen signaling signature being higher in ER than in BRER. BRER was more resistant to docetaxel than ER. Clinical significance of our results was confirmed using Finnish patient data and public patient data. In castration resistant patients response to enzalutamide treatment were decreased in patients first treated with bicalutamide comparing patients treated only with enzalutamide. In conclusion, we showed that transcriptomic and phenotypic changes occurring during formation of drug resistances and docetaxel sensitivity depend on the sequence of treatments. Treatment responses were also different in sequentially treated patients. In the future, this may inform treatment sequencing to retain the PCa cells more sensitivity to subsequent treatment lines.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Role of CYP3A5 in modulating androgen receptor signaling and its relevance to African American men with prostate cancer 95%
- Stroma transcriptomic and proteomic profile of prostate cancer metastasis xenograft models reveals conservation of bonemicroenvironment signatures 95%
- The TLK1-MK5 axis regulates motility, invasion, and metastasis of prostate cancer cells 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Association of the rs1042522 SNP with prostate cancer risk: a study of cancer tissues, primary tumor cultures and serum samples from a European Caucasian population 95%
- Osthole Suppresses Prostate Cancer Progression by Modulating PRLR and the JAK2/STAT3 Signaling Axis 94%
- Digital Spatial Profiling identifies phospho-JNK as a biomarker for early risk stratification of aggressive prostate cancer 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Optimized transcriptional signature for evaluation of MEK/ERK pathway baseline activity and long-term modulations in ovarian cancer 93%
- Unmasking Neuroendocrine Prostate Cancer with a Machine Learning-Driven 7-Gene Stemness Signature that Predicts Progression 92%
- Protein profiling of WERI RB1 and etoposide resistant WERI ETOR reveals new insights into topoisomerase inhibitor resistance in retinoblastoma 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- RELA is Sufficient to Mediate Interleukin-1 (IL-1) Repression of Androgen Receptor Expression and Activity in LNCaP Disease Progression Model 94%
- Use of Droplet Digital PCR for Consistent Detection of TMPRSS2:ERG Gene Fusion Transcripts Initiated In Vitro 94%
- Mapping Molecular Diversity in Prostate Cancer with a Combined Multiplex IHC and RNA-ISH Assay 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.