Determining the Efficacy, Feasibility, and Impact of Storage Conditions on At-Home Blood Collection Kits for Proteomic Studies
Scranton, C.; Sun, X.; Rodriguez, D.; Pogreba-Brown, K.; Austhof, E.; McFadden, C. M.; Obergh, V.; Cooper, K. K.
Show abstract
BackgroundAt-home blood collection kits have the potential to greatly increase the efficiency of blood collection for diagnostic or research purposes by reducing the cost and burden on participants, researchers, or physicians and eliminating the need for a phlebotomist, specialized equipment, and on-site processing. These kits have shown to be effective for studying specific blood metabolites and proteins, but for analyses targeting the entire proteome, their effectiveness is unknown. MethodsFor this pilot study, data on human serum proteome was compared when blood was capillary-collected with a Tasso+ device (Tasso Inc.) versus the gold-standard venous samples drawn by a trained phlebotomist. Analyses were conducted using the SomaScan 7K assay (SomaLogic Inc.), which assesses the levels of nearly 7,600 serum proteins. Additionally, duplicate Tasso+ blood samples were also subjected to a variety of pre-processing storage temperatures and times to mimic the effects of shipping samples from participants on the serum proteome compared to baseline samples. ResultsMinimal differences were seen between the serum proteome results of capillary and venous blood for all participants. Delays in processing of greater than 48 hours led to large changes in detected protein levels throughout the serum proteome, while lower holding temperatures (refrigeration at >4{degrees}C) pre-processing decreased the amount of change in the serum proteome. ConclusionsOverall, it was determined that when processed immediately, capillary blood gives similar results to venous blood, while minimizing the time (<48 hrs) and temperature (<4{degrees}C) can minimize the serum proteome changes in samples collected by at-home blood collection kits and detected by the 7K assay.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- SARS-CoV-2-positive patients display considerable differences in proteome diversity in urine, nasopharyngeal, gargle solution and bronchoalveolar lavage fluid samples 95%
- Concurrent lipidomics and proteomics on malignant plasma cells from multiple myeloma patients: Probing the lipid metabolome 94%
- Plasma proteome signature of canine acute haemorrhagic diarrhoea syndrome (AHDS) 93%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Molecular characterization of triple negative breast cancer formaldehyde-fixed paraffin-embedded samples by data independent acquisition proteomics 93%
- Parallel Analyses by Mass Spectrometry (MS) and Reverse Phase Protein Array (RPPA) Reveal Complementary Proteomic Profiles in Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) Patient Tissues and Cell Cultures 93%
- A fast and sensitive size-exclusion chromatography method for plasma extracellular vesicle proteomic analysis 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of sample preservation and storage methods for metaproteomics analysis of intestinal microbiomes 93%
- Rapid semi-quantitative point of care diagnostic test for post vaccination antibody monitoring 90%
- Evaluation of RNAlater™ as a field-compatible preservation method for metaproteomic analyses of bacteria-animal symbioses 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.