Back

Cortical hemodynamic biomarkers forecast rTMS responsiveness in post-stroke upper limb motor recovery

Wu, X.; Han, T.; Liang, L.; Shi, Q.; Xu, M.; Lin, X.; Xue, B.; Gao, M.; Zhang, X.; Xie, J.; Sun, X.; Yuan, H.

2025-05-13 neurology
10.1101/2025.05.12.25327481 medRxiv
Show abstract

BACKGROUNDStroke commonly causes upper limb impairment, significantly reducing quality of life. While low-frequency repetitive transcranial magnetic stimulation (LF-rTMS) over contralesional primary motor cortex (M1) improves arm function, its effectiveness varies, particularly in severe cases. METHODSStroke patients with upper limb paralysis were recruited for 14-day LF-rTMS. Baseline data, including demographics and stroke details, were recorded. Upper limb motor function was assessed using the upper extremity Fugl-Meyer assessment (UEFM) and the Wolf motor function test. Functional near-infrared spectroscopy (fNIRS) data were collected during fist clenching, and the laterality index (LI) was calculated to assess the asymmetry of hemispheric activation in the brain. A model was developed and validated both internally and externally to predict the responsiveness of LF-rTMS. RESULTSThis prospective multicenter study included 111 patients with stroke (training cohort, 62; internal/external validation cohorts, 25/24). After 14-day of LF-rTMS, upper limb motor function improved significantly (P<0.001), with a response rate of 61.3%. The least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and multivariate logistic regression analyses revealed that the pre-intervention UEFM score (P=0.015, odds ratio [OR]=1.048) and pre-intervention LI for M1 for the affected hand (AFF-LI-M1-pre) (P=0.001, OR=0.117) were independent predictive factors for the responsiveness of LF-rTMS. The predictive nomogram integrating pre-intervention UEFM score and AFF-LI-M1-pre demonstrated robust discriminative accuracy across cohorts, with AUC values of 0.861 (95% CI 0.770-0.952) in training, 0.853 (95% CI 0.703-1.000) in internal validation, and 0.828 (95% CI 0.645-1.000) in external validation cohorts. Model calibration showed excellent agreement between predicted and observed outcomes (Hosmer-Lemeshow P=0.801). Decision curve analysis (DCA) confirmed clinical utility within broad probability thresholds (0.02-0.94), yielding net benefit advantages of 7%-38% over default strategies. CONCLUSIONSLF-rTMS improved upper limb motor recovery in patients with stroke, with the baseline UEFM score and fNIRS-derived AFF-LI-M1-pre serving as robust predictors. Validated nomogram personalizes therapy, highlighting fNIRSs role in optimizing treatment. These findings support precision rehabilitation approaches for improving outcomes in resource-limited settings. GRAPHIC ABSTRACTA graphic abstract is available for this article.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.