Back

S4, a Selective Androgen Receptor Modulator, Suppresses Breast Cancer Progression via Cell Cycle Arrest, Apoptosis, and Metabolic Alterations

Yavuz, M.; Demircan, T.

2025-05-10 cancer biology
10.1101/2025.05.05.652263 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Breast cancer (BC) remains a leading cause of cancer-related mortality worldwide, highlighting the need for novel therapeutic strategies. Androgen receptor (AR) signaling has been implicated in BC progression, making it a potential target for treatment. Selective androgen receptor modulators (SARMs) have gained attention as alternatives to traditional hormone therapies. However, the effects of S4, a SARM, on BC have not been explored. This study investigates the impact of S4 on BC cell viability, proliferation, clonogenicity, migration, apoptosis, and cell cycle progression in MCF-7 and MDA-MB-231 cells. The results demonstrate that S4 significantly reduces BC cell viability in a dose-dependent manner, with IC50 values of 0.094 mM (MCF-7) and 0.067 mM (MDA-MB-231) after 24 hours. S4 suppresses clonogenicity and migration while promoting apoptosis and cell cycle arrest, with MCF-7 cells exhibiting S-phase arrest and MDA-MB-231 cells G0/G1-S arrest. Gene expression analysis reveals upregulation of tumor suppressor genes (CDKN1B and PUMA in MCF-7 cells, TP53, CDKN1A, and BAX in MDA-MB-231 cells, and GADD45A in both cells) and downregulation of oncogenes (ANKRD1, EDN1, CCND1 in MCF-7 cells, CXCL2 in MDA-MB-231 cells, CDK-6 and ATM in both cells), supporting the anti-carcinogenic effects of S4. Metabolomics profiling highlights significant alterations in phosphatidylcholine biosynthesis, catecholamine biosynthesis, and nucleotide metabolism, indicating a metabolic shift upon S4 treatment. These findings provide the first evidence of S4s potential as an anti-cancer agent in BC, suggesting that it exerts its effects by modulating gene expression and cellular metabolism. Further in-vivo studies are warranted to validate its therapeutic potential.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.