Back

ORANGE: A Machine Learning Approach for Modeling Tissue-Specific Aging from Transcriptomic Data

Jalal, W.; Musarrat, M.; Samee, M. A. H.; Rahman, M. S.

2025-05-08 bioinformatics
10.1101/2025.05.02.651895 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Despite aging being a fundamental biological process which profoundly influences health and disease, the interplay between tissue-specific aging and mortality remains underexplored. This study applies machine learning on GTEx transcriptomic data to model tissue-specific biological ages across 12 different types of tissues and introduces an age-gap metric to quantify deviations from the chronological age. We use several modeling techniques optimized with three feature selection strategies: Pearson correlation, age-related differentially expressed genes, and tissue-enriched genes (expressed at least fourfold higher in a specific tissue). Among these, Pearson correlation combined with elastic net regression yields the best performance, with models achieving an average RMSE of 6.44 years and an R2 of 0.64. To quantify deviations from chronological age relative to the population, we train neural networks to regress predicted ages against chronological ages, and subtract their outputs from the predicted ages to calculate a metric which we call the age-gap. Age-gap statistics reveal significant tissue-specific aging patterns, identifying extreme agers and correlations between extreme aging and mortality. About 20% of subjects are found to exhibit extreme aging in one tissue, while 1% show multi-organ aging. Further analysis reveals that accelerated aging in specific tissues correlates with with greater risk of death from illness. These findings greatly emphasize the role of transcriptomics in aging research and its implications for health and longevity.

Published in Briefings in Bioinformatics (predicted rank #7) · training set

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.