"Exponere" A National Level Peer-Based Research Mentorship Programme and Protocol Presentation Competition for and by the Medical Undergraduate Students in India - A 2 year Experience
Rao, S.; Lalwani, D.; Zagade, Y.; Nayan, A.; Tripathi, R.
Show abstract
IntroductionIn response to the lack of research engagement among medical undergraduates, ASPIRE at Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital introduced an innovative mentorship program during their academic fest, Confluence. This program counters the typical challenges faced by students, such as mentorship access and practical experience, by providing structured, comprehensive training in research methodologies. MethodologyIn the study, four custom-developed and validated questionnaires assessed biomedical research knowledge, attitudes, skills, and post-session feedback among participants of the National Level Peer-Based Research Mentorship Programme (NLPRMP) in India. The prospective evaluation study included mentees from the 2021 and 2022 cohorts, using a rigorous selection process for team formation based on research interests and experience. The program curriculum, revised in 2022 based on feedback, encompassed key research methodology topics and concluded with a protocol presentation competition. Data analysis involved pre and post-programme questionnaires, using statistical tools to evaluate shifts in participants research perspectives and capabilities. ResultsThe study, involving 64 medical students in a mentorship program, demonstrated significant improvements in various areas post-mentorship. Knowledge scores increased notably, attitudes towards medical research became more positive, motivation for engaging in medical research grew, and there were enhancements in research-related skills. Additionally, students perception of research as a career option and their views on integrating research into the medical curriculum improved substantially, underlining the mentorship programs profound impact on their academic and professional development. ConclusionExponere, the National Level Peer-Based Research Mentorship Programme at Seth GSMC and KEM Hospital significantly enhanced research engagement among medical undergraduates. It effectively improved their knowledge, attitudes, and skills in biomedical research, fostering a greater inclination towards research as a career path. This innovative approach, addressing the previously identified gaps in early research exposure and practical experience, underscores the programs pivotal role in shaping the future of evidence-based medical practice.
Matching journals
The top 1 journal accounts for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 97%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 96%
- Perceptions, attitudes, and challenges regarding continuing professional development among Ethiopian Medical Laboratory professionals: A mixed-method study 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 97%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 97%
- Assessment of research ethics education offerings of pharmacy master programs: a qualitative content analysis 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of Self-Directed Learning Activities at King Abdulaziz University: A Qualitative Study of Faculty Perceptions 97%
- Data Driven Monitoring in Community Based Management of SAM children using Psychometric Techniques: An Operational Framework 92%
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Conceptualizing centers of excellence: A global evidence 95%
- Evaluating a first fully automated interview grounded in Multiple Mini Interview (MMI) methodology: results from a feasibility study 93%
- Calculated grades, predicted grades, forecasted grades and actual A-level grades: Reliability, correlations and predictive validity in medical school applicants, undergraduates, and postgraduates in a time of COVID-19 93%
Similar papers in this journal
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.