Development and Validation of Machine Learning Models for Adverse Events after Cardiac Surgery
Jin, Q.; Amal, S.; Rabb, J. B.; Mazhude, F.; Shivandi, V.; Kramer, R. S.; Sawyer, D. B.; Winslow, R. L.
Show abstract
ImportanceEarly recognition of adverse events after cardiac surgery is vital for treatment. However, the widely used Society of Thoracic Surgery (STS) risk model has modest performance in predicting adverse events and only applies <80% of cardiac surgeries. ObjectiveTo develop and validate machine learning (ML) models for predicting outcomes after cardiac surgery. Design, setting, and participantsML models, referred as Roux-MMC model, were developed and validated using a retrospective cohort extracted from the STS Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) at Maine Medical Center (MMC) between January 2012 to December 2021. It was further validated on a prospective cohort of MMC between January 2022 to February 2024. The performance of Roux-MMC model is compared with the STS model. Exposure cardiac surgery Main outcomes and measuresPostoperative outcomes: mortality, stroke, renal failure, reoperation, prolonged ventilation, major morbidity or mortality, prolonged length of stay (PLOS) and short length of stay (SLOS). Primary measure: area under the receiver-operating curve (AUROC). ResultsA retrospective cohort of 9,841 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 [59-74] years; 7,127 [72%] males) and a prospective cohort of 2,305 patients (median [IQR] age, 67 [59-73] years; 1,707 [74%] males) were included. In the prospective cohort, the Roux-MMC model achieves performance for prolonged ventilation (AUROC 0.911 [95% CI, 0.887-0.935]), PLOS (AUROC 0.875 [95% CI, 0.848-0.898]), renal failure (AUROC 0.878 [95% CI, 0.829-0.921]), mortality (AUROC 0.882 [95% CI, 0.837-0.920]), reoperation (AUROC 0.824 [95% CI, 0.787-0.860]), SLOS (AUROC 0.818 [95% CI, 0.801-0.835]) and major morbidity or mortality (AUROC 0.859 [95% CI, 0.832-0.884]). The Roux-MMC model outperforms the STS model for all 8 outcomes, achieving 0.020-0.167 greater AUROC. The Roux-MMC model covers all cardiac surgery patients, while the STS model applies to only 65% in the retrospective and 77% in the prospective cohorts. Conclusion and relevanceWe developed ML models to predict 8 postoperative outcomes on all cardiac surgery patients using preoperative and intraoperative variables. The Roux-MMC model outperforms the STS model in the prospective cohort. The Roux-MMC model is built on STS ACSD, a data system used in [~]1000 US hospitals, thus, it has the potential to easily applied in other hospitals. Key PointsQuestion. Can a predictive model be developed using preoperative and intraoperative variables from the Society of Thoracic Surgeons (STS) Adult Cardiac Surgery Database (ACSD) to accurately predict adverse events after cardiac surgery? Findings. Machine learning (ML) models developed and validated on a retrospective cohort of 9,841 patients. In the prospective validation cohort, models demonstrated good discrimination for postoperative adverse events including mortality (AUC, 0.882), prolonged ventilation (AUC, 0.911), renal failure (AUC, 0.878), major morbidity or mortality (AUC, 0.859) and prolonged length of stay (AUC, 0.875). ML Models outperform the widely used STS model. Meaning. Predictive models based on preoperative and intraoperative variables from STS ACSD, a data collection system implemented in [~]1000 US hospitals, were developed and validated to predict adverse events after cardiac surgery, allowing for straightforward testing at other institutions.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Learning-based Prediction of Early Cerebrovascular Events after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement 94%
- Imputation of PaO2 from SpO2 values from the MIMIC-III Critical Care Database Using Machine-Learning Based Algorithms 94%
- Risk factors for severe COVID-19 differ by age: a retrospective study of hospitalized adults 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Effectiveness of an Impella versus intra-aortic balloon pump in patients who received extracorporeal membrane oxygenation 94%
- Prognostic Value of Patient-Reported Outcomes in Predicting Long-term Mortality after Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement (TAVR) 94%
- Patient Risk-Benefit Preferences for Transcatheter versus Surgical Mitral Valve Repair 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Hemodynamic profiles by non-invasive monitoring of cardiac index and vascular tone in acute heart failure patients in the emergency department: external validation and clinical outcomes 94%
- An assessment of the value of deep neural networks in genetic risk prediction for surgically relevant outcomes 94%
- ChatGPT Provides Inconsistent Risk-Stratification of Patients With Atraumatic Chest Pain 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- CT-based Rapid Triage of COVID-19 Patients: Risk Prediction and Progression Estimation of ICU Admission, Mechanical Ventilation, and Death of Hospitalized Patients 94%
- Development of a predictive risk model for severe COVID-19 disease using population-based administrative data 92%
- Deep Learning Interpretation of Echocardiograms 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Quantitative chest CT combined with plasma cytokines predict outcomes in COVID-19 patients 92%
- ChatGPT achieves comparable accuracy to specialist physicians in predicting the efficacy of high-flow oxygen therapy 92%
- Prediction of atrial fibrillation and stroke using machine learning models in UK Biobank 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.