Evaluating Online Educational Resources for Osteogenesis Imperfecta: Insights from Google, Bing, and ChatGPT3.5
Partin, V. P.; Hooberman-Pineiro, A. M.; Pace, A. A.
Show abstract
BackgroundOsteogenesis Imperfecta is a rare connective tissue disorder resulting in a diverse range of musculoskeletal deformities. Patient education is an important aspect of medical care, and the internet is a popular place in which patients seek information about their medical conditions. This is a cross-sectional study aimed to evaluate the quality of online patient educational websites about Osteogenesis Imperfecta. MethodsThe authors searched for patient education websites using Google and Bing. Twenty patient education websites about Osteogenesis Imperfecta were collected from each. Websites meeting inclusion criteria were evaluated using the DISCERN tool, JAMA Benchmark Criteria evaluation, and a Flesch-Kincaid Readability test. T-tests were used to compare search engine results. Websites were also collected from ChatGPT3.5, however, due to hallucinations and exclusion criteria, the sample size was too small to compare to the search engines. ResultsNo significant differences were found between search engines, and the quality of the websites was not high. Average overall ratings for DISCERN were mediocre, and for the JAMA criteria they were low. The average readability scores required 8-9 grade level reading comprehension, although there was variability within each search engine. ConclusionNeither search engine provided significantly better sources than the other, the overall quality of the websites was not high, and the low readability scores could make these difficult for patients with lower health literacy to understand
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Development of a knowledge translation platform for ataxia: Impact on readers and volunteer contributors 95%
- Investigating the Nature of Open Science Practices Across Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An Audit 94%
- Woman Authorship in Pre-print Versus Peer-Reviewed Oral Health-Related Publications: A Two-Year Observational Study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Developing a taxonomy of care coordination for people living with rare conditions: A qualitative study 92%
- Development of models of care coordination for rare conditions: A qualitative study 91%
- The COVID-19 pandemic impact on continuity of care provision on rare brain diseases and on Ataxia, Dystonia and PKU. A scoping review protocol 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Open Science Practices Among Authors Published in Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An International, Cross-Sectional Survey 93%
- The PBL teaching method in Neurology Education in the Traditional Chinese Medicine undergraduate students: An Observational Study 93%
- SGCI (Smartwatch Gait Coordination Index): New Measure for Human Gait Utilizing Smartwatch Sensor 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.