Back

Synthesis and validation of a metal-organic framework able to quench DNA fluorescence

Goodrich, J.; Beladi, A.; Joshua, K.; Bhatti, H.

2025-01-17 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2025.01.16.633169 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Access to practical research experience is typically limited for life science undergraduates at UK universities. This is confounded by a lack of time to pursue research given course commitments, and the competition for limited spaces on internships or other schemes. To overcome these issues, we hypothesised methods to increase students independent access to research, allowing them to design and undertake useful experiments from first principles. Here, we describe the methods allowing a group of undergraduates to successfully devise and completed a research project independent from their university and academic functions.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
● 5266 papers in training set
Top 11%
15.6%
Similar papers in this journal
2
Frontiers in Microbiology
○ 427 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
8.2%
Similar papers in this journal
3
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
● 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.0%
Similar papers in this journal
4
Ecology and Evolution
○ 267 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
6.5%
Similar papers in this journal
5
HardwareX
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.7%
Similar papers in this journal
6
F1000Research
○ 88 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
5.3%
7
ACS Omega
● 105 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.5%
50% of probability mass above
8
Heliyon
○ 152 papers in training set
Top 1.0%
3.6%
9
Frontiers in Bioinformatics
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.9%
10
FEBS Open Bio
○ 31 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.7%
11
eLife
● 5828 papers in training set
Top 41%
2.5%
12
Scientific Reports
○ 3612 papers in training set
Top 40%
2.5%
13
Frontiers in Behavioral Neuroscience
○ 49 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
2.2%
14
Gigabyte
● 62 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
15
eneuro
● 439 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
16
Royal Society Open Science
● 214 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.2%
17
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
○ 20 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
18
Acta Crystallographica Section D Structural Biology
● 59 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.2%
19
Lab Animal
○ 11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
20
Wellcome Open Research
○ 67 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.1%
21
Analytical and Bioanalytical Chemistry
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
22
PeerJ
◐ 308 papers in training set
Top 8%
1.1%
23
Ecological Informatics
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
0.9%
24
Sustainability
○ 10 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.9%
25
FASEB BioAdvances
○ 18 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.6%
26
BMC Research Notes
○ 33 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
mBio
● 833 papers in training set
Top 12%
0.5%
28
Bioinformatics Advances
◐ 203 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.5%
29
iScience
○ 1154 papers in training set
Top 44%
0.5%
30
Frontiers in Bioengineering and Biotechnology
○ 98 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.