Back

Feasibility of real-time fMRI neurofeedback for rehabilitation of reading deficits in aphasia.

Boukrina, O.; Yamin, A.; Yue, G. H.; Kong, Y.; Koush, Y.

2025-01-05 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2025.01.03.25319980 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundReading impairments, a common consequence of stroke-induced aphasia, significantly hinder life participation, affecting both functional and leisure activities. Traditional post-stroke rehabilitation strategies often show limited generalization beyond trained materials, underscoring the need for novel interventions targeting the underlying neural mechanisms. MethodThis study investigates the feasibility and potential effectiveness of real-time functional magnetic resonance imaging (fMRI) neurofeedback (NFB) intervention for reading deficits associated with stroke and aphasia. We enrolled left-hemisphere stroke survivors in the subacute recovery period and healthy controls in an fMRI NFB intervention study focusing on increasing activation within the left supramarginal gyrus (SMG), a critical region for reading supporting orthography-phonology conversion. ResultsPreliminary findings demonstrate that stroke participants showed significant improvements in reading comprehension and phonological awareness, as evidenced by marked gains on the Reading Comprehension Battery for Aphasia (RCBA) and a phonology two-alternative forced choice test. Functional MRI results indicated that stroke participants exhibited increased activation from day 1 to day 3 of NFB training within the left SMG and the broader left hemisphere reading network, particularly during challenging nonword reading tasks. Healthy controls also showed increased activation during NFB regulation and reading tasks, but these changes were outside the traditional reading network, involving regions associated with cognitive control, reward anticipation, and learning. In both stroke participants and healthy controls, we also found changes in dynamic functional connectivity of multiple resting state networks from before to after NFB training. ConclusionsAlthough preliminary, this research contributes to the development of biologically informed interventions for reading deficits in aphasia, representing an early step towards improving post-stroke rehabilitation outcomes. Future randomized controlled trials are necessary to validate these findings by including a sham NFB control group within a larger participant sample. RegistrationThe study was preregistered on ClinicalTrials.gov, NCT# NCT04875936

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.