Machine Learning Models for Predicting Medium-Term Heart Failure Prognosis: Discrimination and Calibration Analysis
Kato, K.; Nishimo, T.; Tara, S.; Hayashi, D.; Seki, T.; Takiguchi, T.; Kubota, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Maruyama, M.; Kodani, E.; Kobayashi, N.; Shirakabe, A.; Otsuka, T.; Yokobori, S.; Kondo, Y.; Asai, K.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe number of patients with heart failure (HF) is increasing with an aging population, shifting care from hospitals to clinics. Predicting medium-term prognosis after discharge can improve clinical care and reduce readmissions; however, no established model has been evaluated with both discrimination and calibration. ObjectivesThis study aimed to develop and assess the feasibility of machine learning (ML) models in predicting the medium-term prognosis of patients with HF. MethodsThis study included 4,904 patients with HF admitted to four affiliated hospitals at Nippon Medical School (2018-2023). Four ML models--logistic regression, random forests, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting--were developed to predict the endpoints of death or emergency hospitalization within 180 days of discharge. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets (8:2), and the ML models were trained on the training dataset and evaluated using the validation dataset. ResultsAll models demonstrated acceptable performance as assessed by the area under the precision-recall curve. The models showed favorable agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes in the calibration evaluations with the calibration slope and Brier score. Successful risk stratification of medium-term outcomes was achieved for individual patients with HF. The SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithm identified nursing care needs as a significant predictor alongside established laboratory values for HF prognosis. ConclusionsML models effectively predict the 180-day prognosis of patients with HF, and the influence of nursing care needs underscores the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in HF care. Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr; unique identifier: UMIN000054854
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting 30-Day and 1-Year Mortality in Heart Failure with Preserved Ejection Fraction (HFpEF) 96%
- External validation of a claims-based model to predict left ventricular ejection fraction class in patients with heart failure 95%
- Assessing Red Blood Cell Distribution Width in Vietnamese Heart Failure Patients: A Cross-Sectional Study 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Deep Neural Survival Networks for Cardiovascular Risk Prediction: The Multi-Ethnic Study of Atherosclerosis (MESA) 94%
- Detecting Heart Failure using novel bio-signals and a Knowledge Enhanced Neural Network 93%
- Unsupervised Discovery of Risk Profiles on Negative and Positive COVID-19 Hospitalized Patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Validation of a parsimonious AI-Based Risk Score for Mortality in Heart Failure: A UK cohort study 93%
- Using ECG Machine Learning for Detection of Cardiovascular Disease in African American Men and Women: the Jackson Heart Study 92%
- International Evaluation Of An Artificial Intelligence-Powered Ecg Model Detecting Occlusion Myocardial Infarction 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Metabolomic profile for understanding heart failure classifications 96%
- Integrating Bioinformatics and Machine Learning to Investigate the Mechanisms by Which Three Major Respiratory Infectious Diseases Exacerbate Heart Failure 95%
- Can machine learning improve risk prediction of incident hypertension? An internal method comparison and external validation of the Framingham risk model using HUNT Study data 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting long-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a prospective nested case-control analysis for county-level health services 95%
- Development and Validation of a Nomogram for Predicting Survival in Patients With Cardiogenic Shock 93%
- Development and validation of a cardiovascular diseases risk prediction model for Chinese males (CVDMCM) 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.