Back

Machine Learning Models for Predicting Medium-Term Heart Failure Prognosis: Discrimination and Calibration Analysis

Kato, K.; Nishimo, T.; Tara, S.; Hayashi, D.; Seki, T.; Takiguchi, T.; Kubota, Y.; Yamamoto, T.; Maruyama, M.; Kodani, E.; Kobayashi, N.; Shirakabe, A.; Otsuka, T.; Yokobori, S.; Kondo, Y.; Asai, K.

2024-12-18 cardiovascular medicine
10.1101/2024.12.17.24319186 medRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundThe number of patients with heart failure (HF) is increasing with an aging population, shifting care from hospitals to clinics. Predicting medium-term prognosis after discharge can improve clinical care and reduce readmissions; however, no established model has been evaluated with both discrimination and calibration. ObjectivesThis study aimed to develop and assess the feasibility of machine learning (ML) models in predicting the medium-term prognosis of patients with HF. MethodsThis study included 4,904 patients with HF admitted to four affiliated hospitals at Nippon Medical School (2018-2023). Four ML models--logistic regression, random forests, extreme gradient boosting, and light gradient boosting--were developed to predict the endpoints of death or emergency hospitalization within 180 days of discharge. The patients were randomly divided into training and validation sets (8:2), and the ML models were trained on the training dataset and evaluated using the validation dataset. ResultsAll models demonstrated acceptable performance as assessed by the area under the precision-recall curve. The models showed favorable agreement between the predicted and observed outcomes in the calibration evaluations with the calibration slope and Brier score. Successful risk stratification of medium-term outcomes was achieved for individual patients with HF. The SHapley Additive exPlanations algorithm identified nursing care needs as a significant predictor alongside established laboratory values for HF prognosis. ConclusionsML models effectively predict the 180-day prognosis of patients with HF, and the influence of nursing care needs underscores the importance of multidisciplinary collaboration in HF care. Clinical Trial RegistrationURL: https://www.umin.ac.jp/ctr; unique identifier: UMIN000054854

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.