Back

APOE genotype and the effect of statins: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Asiimwe, I. G.; Gebru, T.; Jorgensen, A. L.; Pirmohamed, M.; Multimorbidity Mechanism and Therapeutic Research Collaborative (MMTRC),

2024-12-13 genetic and genomic medicine
10.1101/2024.12.13.24318973 medRxiv
Show abstract

IntroductionThe APOE genotype may affect statin therapy response. We conducted a systematic review and meta-analysis to update and quantify this association across various outcomes. MethodsWe searched seven databases (MEDLINE, Scopus, Web of Science, The Cochrane Library, APA PsycINFO, CINAHL Plus, and ClinicalTrials.gov) on 9th May 2024. Screening and data extraction were performed by two reviewers and a machine learning tool (ASReview). ResultsFrom 4,352 de-duplicated records, 68 studies were included in the systematic review and 52 in the meta-analysis. Biomarkers analysed included Low-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (LDLC), Total Cholesterol (TC), Triglycerides (TG), and High-Density Lipoprotein Cholesterol (HDLC). Compared to{varepsilon} 3 carriers,{varepsilon} 2 carriers showed greater reductions in LDLC (mean difference: -2.98%, 95% CI: -5.88% to -0.08%) and similar reductions in TC (-2.73%, -5.62% to 0.16%), and TG (-4.95%, -11.93% to 2.04%) with no significant difference in HDLC (-0.09%, -3.10% to 2.91%). After adjusting for publication bias,{varepsilon} 4 carriers showed less pronounced statin effects, with smaller reductions in LDLC (mean difference: 10.04%, 6.04% to 14.04%), TC (8.99%, 5.08% to 12.90%), and TG (8.24%, 2.15% to 14.33%), along with a smaller increase in HDLC (-10.08%, -15.30% to -4.85%) compared to{varepsilon} 3 carriers. Study quality was uncertain, and heterogeneity (partly explained by sex and Familial Hypercholesterolemia) was high, especially for the percentage changes. A stronger genotype effect was seen in males. ConclusionOur meta-analysis shows that APOE genotype can significantly influence statin response, emphasizing the need to incorporate known genetic factors into personalized treatment regimes.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.