Optimizing Student Success: Leaders' Perspectives on Advising Practices in Graduate Health Professions Education Programs
Meyer, H.; Samuel, A.; Cleland, J.; Maggio, L.; Artino, A. R.; Scarlett, E.; Martin, P. C.
Show abstract
PhenomenonEffective graduate advising is crucial for student success but remains an understudied area, particularly in Health Professions Education (HPE). While the importance of advising is widely recognized, faculty often lack adequate preparation and face competing demands. Current research on advising primarily focuses on other disciplines, neglecting the unique challenges of HPE programs. This study aims to address this gap by exploring leaders perspectives on advising practices that optimize student success in HPE graduate programs. ApproachA qualitative interview study using narrative inquiry was conducted to explore leaders perspectives on advising practices in graduate HPE programs globally. Purposive sampling was used to recruit program leaders across six World Health Organization regions. Semi-structured interviews were conducted and analyzed using narrative inquiry and developmental advising theory as a framework. FindingsFifteen HPE program leaders described advising practices focused on academic advancement, personal advancement, and community building. Leaders emphasized the importance of clear communication, goal setting, and student support. While advisors valued building strong relationships with students, challenges arose from balancing professional and personal roles. Findings suggest that a developmental advising approach, incorporating academic, personal, and community-building elements, can enhance student success in HPE graduate programs. InsightsThis study underscores the critical role of advisors in graduate HPE programs, revealing that effective advising involves both academic guidance and substantial emotional support. It highlights a gap in the existing literature and advocates for the expansion of developmental advising that addresses not only administrative tasks but also the broader developmental needs of students, such as career advancement and personal growth. The findings suggest that to enhance advising practices, graduate HPE programs should invest in ongoing professional development for advisors, adopt holistic advising models, and allocate resources to support students integration into professional communities, thereby preparing them more fully for their future careers.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Effect of introducing interprofessional education concepts on students of various healthcare disciplines in the United Arab Emirates 95%
- Improving capacity for advanced training in obstetric surgery: Evaluation of a blended learning approach 93%
- Perceptions, attitudes, and challenges regarding continuing professional development among Ethiopian Medical Laboratory professionals: A mixed-method study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Using Stakeholder Insights to Enhance Engagement in PhD Professional Development 97%
- A national professional development program fills mentoring gaps for postdoctoral researchers 97%
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 96%
Similar papers in this journal
- Development and Assessment of a Sustainable PhD Internship Program Supporting Diverse Biomedical Career Outcomes 94%
- The life of P.I. - Transitions to Independence in Academia 90%
- Examining the impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on cervical cancer screening practices among clinicians practicing in Federally Qualified Health Centers: A mixed methods study 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Emotional Distress, Stress, Anxiety and the Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Early Career Women in Healthcare Sciences Research 94%
- An e-Leadership Training Academy for Practicing Clinicians in Primary Care and Public Health Settings 91%
- Data-driven hypothesis generation among junior clinical researchers: A comparison of a secondary data analysis with visualization (VIADS) and other tools 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.