Generative AI divide: How College Students' Backgrounds Affect Their Gen AI Literacy
Jiang, J.; Shao, A.
Show abstract
In the field of education, generative artificial intelligence has a profound impact, mainly reflected in areas such as personalized learning, automated assignment evaluation, content generation, and open educational resources. However, some scholars have begun to discuss whether this technology may lead to new inequalities. Therefore, this study aims to explore how user background affects the performance of generative artificial intelligence technology through empirical research while focusing on the potential educational inequalities that may arise in the era of generative AI. The research found that generative artificial intelligence literacy is correlated with grade level, institutional tier, and academic discipline, with higher-grade students, those from prestigious universities, and those studying Applied Sciences and Natural Sciences demonstrating better performance.
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Cloud-controlled microscopy enables remote project-based biology education in Latinx communities in the United States and Latin America 92%
- Anticipatory Emotions and Academic Performance: The Role of Boredom in a Preservice Teachers' Lab Experience 91%
- Linear vector models of time perception account for saccade and stimulus novelty interactions 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Urban Vulnerability Assessment for Pandemic surveillance: The COVID-19 case in Bogotá, Colombia 91%
- Education influences knowledge about environmental issues in Washington, DC, USA 89%
- The effects of biodegradable mulch film on the growth, yield, and water use efficiency of cotton and maize in an arid region 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Factors Affecting the Adoption and Continuance Usage of Drone in Healthcare: The Role of the Environment 95%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 91%
- Defining Destigmatizing Design Guidelines for Use in Sexual Health-Related Digital Technologies: A Delphi Study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.