Back

Blood Omics Models for System-Specific Mortality Risk Estimation

Fuentealba, M.; Arpawong, T. E.; Schneider, K.; Crimmins, E. M.; Furman, D.

2024-12-03 systems biology
10.1101/2024.11.27.625723 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Traditional blood-based aging clocks provide an estimate of a persons overall biological age. However, physiological systems and organs age at different rates in an individual, and anti-aging interventions often target specific physiological systems. Therefore, there is a growing need for methods capable of assessing biological age at the level of specific physiological systems. Here, we used blood chemistry and cell count data from 456,180 individuals in the UK Biobank (UKB) to develop mortality-based predictors of biological age across 9 physiological systems matching WHOs International Classification of Disease (ICD-10) chapters (DiseaseAge). We applied DiseaseAge to the Health and Retirement Study (HRS) cohort and validated its ability to identify biologically older systems in individuals diagnosed or deceased from age-related diseases affecting those systems. For instance, individuals diagnosed with high blood pressure, heart attack, congestive heart failure, or angina exhibited a biologically older circulatory system than other systems. Similarly, individuals with accelerated aging in the circulatory, musculoskeletal, or respiratory systems displayed higher risk of mortality from conditions associated with these systems. Additionally, we showed that individuals within the top 5% biologically older metabolic, circulatory, respiratory and mental systems exhibited increased risk of developing diabetes, high blood pressure, lung disease and dementia, respectively. Finally, we used metabolomics and proteomics data in the UKB and epigenomics and transcriptomics in HRS to generate omics surrogates of DiseaseAge for all physiological systems and created an online resource for their calculation.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.