What are the ethnic inequities in care outcomes related to haematological malignancies, treated with transplant/cellular-therapies, in the UK?
Cusworth, S. J.; Deplano, Z.; Denniston, A.; Burns, D.; Nirantharakumar, K.; Adderley, N. J.; Chandan, J. S.
Show abstract
IntroductionHaematological cancers are common in the UK, with a variety of morphologies. Stem cell transplants and chimeric antigen receptor (CAR) T-cell therapies provide significant options for hard to treat haematological cancers, although with difficult to predict outcomes. Research into the determinates of treatment efficacy, and access to treatments, is key to ensuring equal benefit across patients, and patient safety. With this, there are concerns about the small representation of minority groups in related research. We aim to report on the current knowledge, to guide future research. Methods and analysisA variety of databases will be searched, for literature on UK minority ethnic populations receiving haematopoietic stem cell transplant or CAR T-cell therapy. Many outcomes will be analysed, covering the patient care pathway for those of the target population, although with a focus on follow-up after therapy. Plans have been made to conduct narrative synthesis, with meta-analysis where applicable. Ethics and DisseminationOutputs will be published in an appropriate journal, and discussed with the wider NIHR Blood and Transplant Research Unit in Precision Transplant and Cellular Therapeutics (BTRU) group. Discussions will also be undertaken with the BTRU patient partners group. Strengths and Limitations of this StudyO_LIThis systematic review has a detailed search criteria with a variety of search tools, enabling high sensitivity in obtaining evidence. C_LIO_LITo enable this work to be completed, reviewers will be working independently on separate reference lists, during screening, rather than voting on the same references and resolving conflicts. To alleviate issues, reviewers will be first required to screen a defined number of papers together, using a more classical approach to confirm agreement, before working independently. C_LIO_LIDue to difficulties in pooling together international ethnic groups, only studies in the UK have been included, to reduce complexity. There are some ethnic groups which are more valid to pool together internationally than others, mainly in respect to genetic factors (as opposed to social), which this protocol does not consider. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of observational research methods to real-world studies for rare disease drugs: a scoping review protocol 94%
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 93%
- Effectiveness of integrating cervical cancer prevention strategies into HIV care programmes: A mixed-methods systematic review protocol 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language model-based information extraction from free-text radiology reports: a scoping review protocol 93%
- Surgical Resection, Radiotherapy, And Percutaneous Thermal Ablation for Treatment of Stage 1 Non-Small Cell Lung Cancer: A Systematic Review and Network Meta-Analysis 93%
- CATALYST trial protocol: A multicentre, open-label, phase II, multi-arm trial for an early and accelerated evaluation of the potential treatments for COVID-19 in hospitalised adults 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- The use of the Registered Reports format for publication of randomized clinical trials: a cross-sectional study 92%
- The impact of retracted randomised controlled trials on systematic reviews and clinical practice guidelines: a meta-epidemiological study 92%
- Results reporting for clinical trials led by medical universities and university hospitals in the Nordic countries was often missing or delayed 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Neutrophil counts and cancer prognosis: an umbrella review of systematic reviews and meta-analyses of observational studies 90%
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 90%
- Models of COVID-19 vaccine prioritisation: a systematic literature search and narrative review 90%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.