Back

Effect of quantified cranial osteopathic manipulation on wild type and transgenic rat models of Alzheimer's disease

Hines, D.; Tobey, H.; Dugan, P.; Boehringer, S.; Helm, R.; Anandakrishnan, R.; Werre, S.; VandeVord, P.; Costa, B.

2024-11-14 bioengineering
10.1101/2024.11.05.621645 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Alzheimers Disease is a chronic progressive neurodegenerative disorder that impairs the cerebral lymphatic system and compartmental fluid exchange leading to a decline in cognitive function. Due to the lack of disease modifying medications, non-pharmacological Cranial Osteopathic Manipulation (COM) is evolving as a potential minimally invasive treatment choice. In this work, the effect of quantified COM treatment, using a nanosensor glove, on 3-month-old (Yg) and 18-month-old transgenic (Tg) rat model of Alzheimers Disease were studied using the Morris Water Maze (MWM), Western Blots, and Proteomics and Transcriptomics assays. The results revealed that COM had minimal to no significant difference in the behavioral and biochemical parameters in the Yg rats, suggesting COM treatment was harmless. While COM exhibited no significant differences in Tg rat MWM escape latency, navigation to the platform was significantly different on testing days 5 and 6, with p-values of signed initial heading error were 0.014 and 0.034 respectively. This indicates a difference in learning and spatial working memory. A proteomic assay on Tg rat hippocampus identified 51 significantly differentially expressed proteins with 34 associated with neurological disorders, while transcriptome remained indifferent. In this study, for the first time we have established a technique to quantify the force applied during COM treatment on an animal model of AD, offering a more objective approach for evaluating the effect of such treatments. Our results indicate that a quantifiable COM can be applied to rodents and to study the resulting behavioral and biochemical phenotypes.

Matching journals

The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 8%
19.5%
2
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 4%
10.2%
3
Journal of Neuroscience Research
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
7.1%
4
Biology of Sex Differences
32 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
5.8%
5
ACS Chemical Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.4%
6
Frontiers in Neuroscience
256 papers in training set
Top 1%
3.4%
7
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.9%
50% of probability mass above
8
European Journal of Neuroscience
189 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.8%
9
eneuro
439 papers in training set
Top 3%
2.6%
10
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
74 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.5%
11
International Journal of Molecular Sciences
494 papers in training set
Top 5%
2.5%
12
Frontiers in Pharmacology
111 papers in training set
Top 1%
2.2%
13
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
2.0%
14
Hippocampus
56 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
2.0%
15
Sleep
58 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
16
Frontiers in Cellular Neuroscience
91 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.8%
17
Neurobiology of Disease
148 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
18
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.2%
19
iScience
1154 papers in training set
Top 24%
1.2%
20
The FASEB Journal
194 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.1%
21
Biology Open
156 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.9%
22
Translational Psychiatry
260 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
23
GeroScience
109 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.9%
24
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
26 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
25
European Journal of Pharmacology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.9%
26
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 63%
0.9%
27
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
28
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
29
British Journal of Pharmacology
40 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.6%
30
Hormones and Behavior
45 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.6%