Direct-acting antivirals for chronic hepatitis C infection: a protocol for a systematic review of observational studies
Kumburegama, W. M. B. B.; Kristensen, A. T.; Bjelakovic, G.; Nikolova, D.; Asante, M. A.; Bjelakovic, M.; Koretz, R.; Balakumar, M. M.; Michelsen, M. E.; Klingenberg, S. L.; Gluud, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundChronic hepatitis C virus infection presents a substantial global health burden, frequently resulting in severe liver conditions. Hepatitis C virus (HCV) therapy requires complex decision-making. Direct-acting antivirals (DAAs) offer a potential solution by targeting viral proteins to inhibit replication. Understanding DAAs real-world effectiveness and how they impact long-term outcomes beyond clinical trials is essential. We aim to comprehensively evaluate the benefits and harms of DAAs in individuals with chronic HCV infection, reported in observational studies. MethodsWe will consider for inclusion prospective and retrospective observational studies with quasirandomised, cohort, case-control, controlled before-and-after, and cross-sectional designs. Our experimental interventions will be any class of DAAs available on the market or in development. DAAs could have been administered alone, in combination, or with other medical co-interventions. Our control interventions will be untreated chronic HCV conditions, with or without placebo. Participants will be adults, regardless of demographics, treatment history, or healthcare setting. Our primary outcomes will be participants experiencing hepatitis C-related morbidity or all-cause mortality, serious adverse events, and health-related quality of life. Secondary outcomes will include all-cause mortality, cirrhosis, variceal bleeding, hepato-renal syndrome, hepatocellular carcinoma, hepatic encephalopathy, non-serious adverse events, liver transplantation, lack of sustained virological response, histological improvement, and decreases in alanine aminotransferase and aspartate aminotransferase levels. We will apply search strategies to search MEDLINE, Embase, Web of Science, grey literature, and trial registers. We will use Covidence(R) to screen the result, including citations. Individual double-data extraction will include study details and outcomes, with independent review authors resolving discrepancies. We will assess bias using the ROBINS-I tool. Meta-analyses will employ random-effects models for both dichotomous and continuous outcomes, assessing heterogeneity. Subgroup and sensitivity analyses will explore effect modifications and address missing data. Trial Sequential Analysis will control type I and type II errors. We will evaluate publication bias using funnel plots and Eggers regression test and assess certainty of evidence using GRADE. DiscussionThe findings will inform clinical decisions and benefit those affected by HCV, healthcare professionals, and policymakers. Systematic review registrationPROSPERO: CRD42023494844
Matching journals
The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Protocol for the systematic review of the Pneumocystis jirovecii -associated pneumonia in non-HIV immunocompromised patients 94%
- Laboratory-confirmed respiratory viral infection triggers for acute myocardial infarction and stroke: systematic review protocol 93%
- Population risk factors for severe disease and mortality in COVID-19: A global systematic review and meta-analysis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Comparison of preprints and final journal publications from COVID-19 Studies: Discrepancies in results reporting and spin in interpretation 93%
- An Analysis of Controlled Human Infection Studies Registered on ClinicalTrials.gov 92%
- Efficacy of Lactococcus lactis strain plasma (LC-Plasma) in easing symptoms in patients with mild coronavirus disease 2019 (COVID-19): protocol for an exploratory, multicenter, double-blinded, randomized controlled trial (PLATEAU study) 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Transparency and reporting characteristics of COVID-19 randomized controlled trials 92%
- Tool to assess risk of bias due to missing evidence in network meta-analysis (ROB-MEN): elaboration and examples 91%
- Phase 3, multicentre, double-blind, randomised, parallel-group, placebo-controlled study of camostat mesilate (FOY-305) for the treatment of COVID-19 (CANDLE study) 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Determining population-level allocation strategies for COVID-19 treatments in the United States using a quantitative framework, a case study using nirmatrelvir/ritonavir 92%
- Quantifying potential immortal time bias in observational studies in acute severe infection 92%
- Adverse Events Among People Living with HIV Receiving Dolutegravir Based Regimens: Findings from a Six Month Active Pharmacovigilance Study in Uganda 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Impact of direct-acting antiviral treatment of hepatitis C on the quality of life of adults in Ukraine 92%
- Anti-Hepatitis C Antibody Carriage and Risk of Liver Impairment in Rural-Cameroon: Adapting the Control of Hepatocellular Carcinoma for Resource-Limited Settings 91%
- Efficacy and safety of tenofovir disoproxil fumarate (TDF) in hepatitis B virus (HBV) monoinfection: longitudinal analysis of a UK cohort 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.