Body composition as a biomarker for assessing future lung cancer risk
Wang, J.; Leader, J. K.; Meng, X.; Yu, T.; Wang, R.; Herman, J.; Yuan, J.-M.; Wilson, D.; Pu, J.
Show abstract
PurposeTo investigate if body composition is a biomarker for assessing the risk of developing lung cancer. Materials and MethodsLow-dose computed tomography (LDCT) scans from the Pittsburgh Lung Screening Study (PLuSS) (n=3,635, 22 follow-up years) and NLST-ACRIN (n=16,435, 8 follow-up years) cohorts were used in the study. Artificial intelligence (AI) algorithms were developed to automatically segment and quantify subcutaneous adipose tissue (SAT), visceral adipose tissue (VAT), intramuscular adipose tissue (IMAT), skeletal muscle (SM), and bone. Cause-specific Cox proportional hazards models were used to evaluate the hazard ratios (HRs). Standard time-dependent receiver operating characteristic (ROC) analysis was used to evaluate the prognostic ability of different models over time. ResultsThe final composite models were formed by seven variables: age (HR=1.20), current smoking status (HR=1.59), bone volume (HR=1.79), SM density (HR=0.29), IMAT ratio (HR=0.33), IMAT density (HR=0.56), and SAT volume (HR=0.56). The models trained on the PLuSS cohort achieved a mean AUC of 0.76 (95% CI: 0.74-0.79) over 21 follow-up years and 0.70 (95% CI: 0.66-0.74) over the first 7 follow-up years for predicting lung cancer development within the PLuSS cohort. In contrast, models trained on the PLuSS cohort alone, as well as in combination with the NLST cohorts, achieved an AUC ranging from 0.61 to 0.68 in the NLST cohort over a 7-year follow-up period. ConclusionBody composition assessed on LDCT is a significant predictor of lung cancer risk and could improve the effectiveness of LDCT lung cancer screening by optimizing the screening eligibility and frequency. Summary statementBody composition assessed on LDCT is a significant predictor of lung cancer risk and could improve the effectiveness of LDCT lung cancer screening by optimizing the screening eligibility and frequency. Key PointsO_LIThis study unveils the significant associations between body tissues and lung cancer risk. C_LIO_LIThe prediction models based on body composition alone, as well as the combination of demographics and body composition features can effectively identify patients at higher risk of developing lung cancer. C_LI
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- High-Dimensional Multinomial Multiclass Severity Scoring of COVID-19 Pneumonia Using CT Radiomics Features and Machine Learning Algorithms 94%
- Radiosafe micro-computed tomography for longitudinal evaluation of murine disease models 93%
- An ML prediction model based on clinical parameters and automated CT scan features for COVID-19 patients 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting EGFR mutation status in lung adenocarcinoma presenting as ground-glass opacity: utilizing radiomics model in clinical translation 93%
- Automated airway quantification associates with mortality in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis 92%
- Prediction of oncogene mutation status in non-small cell lung cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis with a special focus on artificial-intelligence-based methods 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Cumulative COVID-19 incidence, mortality, and prognosis in cancer survivors: a population-based study in Reggio Emilia, Northern Italy 89%
- Methylation scores for smoking, alcohol consumption, and body mass index and risk of seven types of cancer 89%
- Inequalities in relative cancer survival by race, immigration status, income, and education for 22 cancer sites in Canada, a cohort study 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- Accuracy of deep learning based computed tomography diagnostic system of COVID-19: a consecutive sampling external validation cohort study 92%
- Quantitative analysis of chest computed tomography of COVID-19 pneumonia using a software widely used in Japan 91%
- Classification performance bias between training and test sets in a limited mammography dataset 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Integration of clinical characteristics, lab tests and a deep learning CT scan analysis to predict severity of hospitalized COVID-19 patients 93%
- Early Prediction of Disease Progression in 2019 Novel Coronavirus Pneumonia Patients Outside Wuhan with CT and Clinical Characteristics 90%
- Uncovering interpretable potential confounders in electronic medical records 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.