Back

Comparable anti-ageing efficacies of a multi-ingredient nutraceutical and a senolytic intervention in old mice

Brookes, C.; Fielder, E.; Low, E.; Barardo, D.; von Zglinicki, T.; Miwa, S.

2024-10-13 cell biology
10.1101/2024.10.11.617853 bioRxiv
Show abstract

Single-ingredient dietary supplements have demonstrated some potential to extend lifespan and improve healthspan; however, the efficacy of defined multi-ingredient nutraceuticals remains underexplored. Senolytic interventions have been successful in reducing multi-morbidity, frailty, and cognitive decline in animal models and are seen as promising anti-ageing interventions in mammals. We compared the effects of a 12-ingredient nutraceutical on mice lifespan and healthspan markers with that of a high efficacy senolytic intervention consisting of a low dose of Navitoclax combined with the specific mitochondrial uncoupler BAM15. Both interventions were started at old age (20 months). The supplement was given daily until the end of the experiment (30 months of age), but the senolytic intervention consisted of two short (5 days each) rounds of treatment at 20 and 23 months of age. Despite late onset, both interventions increased median lifespan similarly by around 20% over controls. The senolytic intervention significantly reduced frailty progression and improved cognitive function after the second round of treatment, but without subsequent treatment, these effects appeared to wane at later ages. The multi-ingredient supplement tended to reduce frailty progression steadily with time, albeit not significant, and maintained cognitive function. Mechanistically, in vitro, there was no evidence of senolytic activity of the multi-ingredient nutraceutical as a whole nor of its individual ingredients. Continuous multi-ingredient dietary supplementation shows promise in achieving comparable anti-ageing efficacy as a senolytic intervention.

Matching journals

The top 2 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.