Cardiovascular and non-cardiovascular risks among female breast cancer survivors in Japan: A matched cohort study
Kawamura, C.; Bhaskaran, K.; Konishi, T.; Sagara, Y.; Bando, H.; Shinozaki, T.; Nojiri, S.; Adomi, M.; Wong, A. Y.; Tamiya, N.; Iwagami, M.
Show abstract
BackgroundThe number of breast cancer (BC) survivors has increased worldwide, but the landscape of their non-cancer disease risks remains unclear, especially among Asian women. MethodsIn the JMDC claims database, which covers company employees and their family members in Japan, women aged 18-74 years with and without an incident BC were matched in a 1:4 ratio for age and entry timing to the database between January 2005 and December 2019. The risks for six cardiovascular diseases (myocardial infarction, heart failure, atrial fibrillation/flutter, ischemic stroke, intracranial hemorrhage, and pulmonary embolism) and six non-cardiovascular diseases (major osteoporotic fractures, other fractures, gastrointestinal bleeding, urinary tract infection, infectious pneumonia, and anxiety/depression) were compared between the groups. FindingsComparing 24,017 BC survivors and 96,068 matched women (mean age, 50{middle dot}5 years), the incidence rates of heart failure, atrial fibrillation/flutter, and all non-cardiovascular diseases were higher in the BC survivor group. The highest adjusted hazard ratio (HR) was noted for heart failure (4{middle dot}09 [95% confidence interval 2{middle dot}58-6{middle dot}50]), followed by gastrointestinal bleeding (3{middle dot}55 [3{middle dot}10-4{middle dot}06]), and anxiety/depression (3{middle dot}06 [2{middle dot}86-3{middle dot}27]). The HRs in the first year were larger than those for 1-10 years for most outcomes, whereas the HRs for fracture outcomes were larger in the 1-10 years group. InterpretationBC survivors in Japan showed an increased risk of many non-cancer diseases compared to women without BC. Most risks increased more steeply during the first year following diagnosis, whereas the risk of fractures increased later. FundingCompetitive research funding from Pfizer Health Research Foundation in Japan.
Matching journals
The top 7 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Venous Thromboembolism and the Effects of Statin and Hormone Therapy: A Case-Control Study of 250,000 Women 50-64 years of age 94%
- Incorporating Polygenic Risk Scores and Nongenetic Risk Factors for Breast Cancer Risk Prediction among Asian Women, Results from Asia Breast Cancer Consortium 90%
- Obesity paradox in patients with cancer: A systematic review and meta-analysis of 6,320,365 patients 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Risk factors for severe outcomes of COVID-19: a rapid review 91%
- Cohort profile: The Westlake BioBank for Chinese (WBBC) pilot cohort: a prospective study for the late adolescence 91%
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Modified FRAX Score for Prediction of Fall-induced Hip Fractures; The Added Value of Fall Energy, Number, and Social Vulnerability Index 92%
- Pan-cancer analyses of the associations between 109 pre-existing conditions and cancer treatment patterns across 19 adult cancers 92%
- Impact of early postoperative ambulation on gait recovery after hip fracture surgery: A multicenter cohort study 91%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- Deprivation and Segregation in Ovarian cancer survival among African American Women: a mediated analysis 91%
- COVID-19 Mortality in California Based on Death Certificates: Disproportionate Impacts Across Racial/Ethnic Groups and Nativity 89%
- Design and methodological considerations for biomarker discovery and validation in the Integrative Analysis of Lung Cancer Etiology and Risk (INTEGRAL) Program 88%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.