Back

Insights into Health Data Science Education: A Qualitative Content Analysis

Rohani, N.; Gallagher, M.; Gal, K.; Manataki, A.

2024-09-24 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2024.09.23.614482 bioRxiv
Show abstract

BackgroundEarly career researchers in Health Data Science (HDS) struggle to effectively manage their learning process due to the novel and interdisciplinary nature of this field. To date, there is limited understanding about learning strategies in health data science. Therefore, we aim to uncover learning strategies that early career researchers employ to address their educational challenges, as well as shed light on their preferences regarding HDS teaching approach and course design. MethodIn this study, we conducted a qualitative content analysis through semistructured interviews with ten early career researchers, including individuals pursuing masters, PhD, and postdoctoral research programmes in HDS, across two higher education institutions in the United Kingdom. Interviews were carried out in person from June 2023 to August 2023. Data were analysed qualitatively using NVivo software. Descriptive statistics were employed for quantitative analysis. ResultsRegarding learning strategies, we identified ten main categories with 22 codes, including collaboration, information seeking, active learning, focus granularity, elaboration, organisation, order granularity, goal orientation, reviewing, and deep learning strategies. Regarding course design and teaching, we discovered four categories with 14 codes, including course materials, duration and complexity, online discussion, and teaching approaches. ConclusionsEarly career researchers used a range of learning strategies aligned with well-established learning theories, such as peer learning, information seeking, and active learning. It is also evident that learners in HDS favour interactive courses that provide them with hands-on experience and interactive discussion. The insights derived from our findings can enhance the quality of education in HDS.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 7%
22.6%
2
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.8%
3
Wellcome Open Research
57 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
9.2%
4
BMC Medical Education
20 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.3%
50% of probability mass above
5
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
4.3%
6
BMC Medical Research Methodology
43 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.3%
7
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.4%
8
FEBS Open Bio
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
9
BMC Research Notes
29 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.9%
10
Journal of General Internal Medicine
20 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.3%
11
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
12
The Lancet Digital Health
25 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.2%
13
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 66%
1.2%
14
GigaScience
172 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
15
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.2%
16
Nature Human Behaviour
85 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.2%
17
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 11%
1.2%
18
Medicine
30 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.2%
19
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 15%
1.1%
20
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.1%
21
PLOS Computational Biology
1633 papers in training set
Top 21%
1.0%
22
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.9%
23
Bioinformatics
1061 papers in training set
Top 9%
0.9%
24
Frontiers in Artificial Intelligence
18 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
BioData Mining
15 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
26
The FEBS Journal
78 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.7%
27
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.6%
28
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 64%
0.5%
29
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.5%