Back

A systematic review of professional society-backed biology education DEI research: The groups, research methods, and levels of analyses comprising the field

Idlebird, C.; Campbell-Montalvo, R.; McDowell, G. S.; Blosser, E.; Harvey, R.; Marcette, J.

2024-09-20 scientific communication and education
10.1101/2024.09.19.613887 bioRxiv
Show abstract

This integrative literature review analyzes the corpus of biology education research published in the main biology education journals of major professional societies. The goal of this analysis is to determine which approaches (including groups of focus, research methods, and settings/perspectives) from social science fields (i.e., psychology, sociology, and anthropology) are utilized in published peer-reviewed biology education research relating to diversity, equity and inclusion (DEI). Scoping how social science approaches are used in this area is important to understanding whether biology education research could benefit from complementary approaches that might advance praxis. This analysis found that research informing the biology education community draws heavily from psychological perspectives that are overwhelmingly not disaggregated (78% of articles identifying a group used a lumped together one), are by far more quantitative (58% used survey, 26% grades, 20% school data) than qualitative (17% used interview, 10% observation), and did not (72%) adopt structural approaches. The addition of missing contributions from social science is critical to advancing interventions to broaden STEM participation given that merging paradigms can offer more robust, multi-level explanations for observed phenomena. This has important implications for education, biology education, biology education research, social science, and research in related STEM fields.

Matching journals

The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B
51 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
27.9%
2
Ecology and Evolution
232 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
14.5%
3
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 18%
10.2%
50% of probability mass above
4
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 13%
6.4%
5
Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
341 papers in training set
Top 1%
6.4%
6
PLANTS, PEOPLE, PLANET
21 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
7
American Journal of Primatology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.1%
8
Ecosphere
53 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.9%
9
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
10
Heliyon
146 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.9%
11
eneuro
389 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.8%
12
Journal of Microbiology & Biology Education
11 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.7%
13
Frontiers in Marine Science
55 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
1.5%
14
Royal Society Open Science
193 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.3%
15
Journal of Cellular Physiology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
1.2%
16
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 68%
1.1%
17
FEBS Letters
42 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.1%
18
Journal of Evolutionary Biology
98 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
1.0%
19
Stem Cell Research
16 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
20
Plant Direct
81 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.0%
21
Developmental Science
15 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
1.0%
22
PLOS Biology
408 papers in training set
Top 18%
0.8%
23
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
24
Ecological Informatics
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
25
Biology of Sex Differences
29 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.7%
26
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.6%
27
FASEB BioAdvances
15 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%