Back

Family income is associated with regional brain glucose metabolism in middle-aged adults

Pak, K.; Shin, S.; Nam, H. Y.; Kim, K.; Kim, J.; Lee, M. J.

2024-09-22 radiology and imaging
10.1101/2024.09.18.24313859 medRxiv
Show abstract

Socioeconomic status is a multifaceted construct that plays a prominent role in shaping our environment by defining our access to healthcare, nutrition, and enrichment, as well as represents social standing. Therefore, to address the effects of family income, and education level on brain glucose metabolism, we analyzed a large cohort of healthy middle-aged adults who underwent brain 18F-FDG PET, and survey of family income and education level. We retrospectively analyzed data of healthy males who underwent health check-up program. Health check-up program included 1) Brain 18F-FDG PET, 2) anthropometric measurements, 3) survey of family income and education level, and 4) measures of stress, anxiety, and depression. The effects of family income and education level on regional SUVR were investigated using Bayesian hierarchical modelling. A total of 233 healthy males were included in this study. Family income was positively correlated with education level. There was no significant indirect effect of family income or education level via stress, anxiety, or depression on regional brain glucose metabolism. Family income is positively associated with brain glucose metabolism in caudate, putamen, anterior cingulate, hippocampus, and amygdala, while education level does not show any significant association with brain glucose metabolism in middle-aged adults. In conclusion, family income is positively associated with brain glucose metabolism in caudate, putamen, anterior cingulate, hippocampus, and amygdala, while education level does not show any significant association with brain glucose metabolism. This finding might reflect the link between family income, and reward sensitivity, stress in middle-aged adults.

Matching journals

The top 11 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.