Back

A systematic review of psychological factors influencing attitudes and intentions toward, and uptake of, Covid-19 vaccines in adolescents

Pitt, A.; Amlot, R.; Heffernan, C.; Rubin, G. J.; Smith, L. E.

2024-09-17 public and global health
10.1101/2024.09.17.24313392 medRxiv
Show abstract

Vaccination was a key measure to tackle the Covid-19 pandemic, however adolescents were less likely than adults to accept the vaccine. Low vaccine uptake reduces the effectiveness of vaccination campaigns and threatens global public health. Understanding why adolescents are hesitant to accept new vaccines is therefore crucial to support the development of novel vaccine uptake interventions. Prior reviews have included far fewer citations, excluded qualitative data, studies after 2022 and have not mapped adolescent Covid-19 vaccine behaviour onto psychological models. This systematic review investigated psychological factors influencing attitudes and intentions toward and uptake of Covid-19 vaccines in adolescents aged 10 to 19 years globally. It mapped results onto the COM-B framework to inform future interventions. Our search identified 25,354 citations, and included 77 in this review. The quality of studies was mixed, predominantly cross-sectional in design. According to our review, key influences on adolescent Covid-19 vaccine behaviour were: i) Reflective motivation (safety concerns, perceived susceptibility to/severity of Covid-19, perceived vaccine effectiveness, ii) Social opportunity (social norms, autonomy and prosocial attitudes), iii) Psychological capability (attitude and knowledge about vaccines). Our review provides new insights into psychological factors influencing adolescent Covid-19 vaccine behaviour, and maps factors to the COM-B model of behaviour change. To improve vaccine uptake, future vaccine interventions should support adolescents to think critically about the pros and cons of vaccines and consider external influences on their decisions.

Matching journals

The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Vaccines
196 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
2
BMC Public Health
147 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.9%
3
Vaccine
189 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
10.9%
4
Human Vaccines & Immunotherapeutics
25 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
50% of probability mass above
5
Frontiers in Public Health
140 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
7.1%
6
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 33%
4.5%
7
BMC Medicine
163 papers in training set
Top 2%
2.7%
8
Vaccine: X
19 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
2.2%
9
Public Health
34 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.8%
10
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 9%
1.7%
11
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 63%
1.4%
12
Journal of Medical Internet Research
85 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.9%
13
Preventive Medicine Reports
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
14
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
15
PLOS Global Public Health
293 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.8%
16
Epidemiology and Infection
84 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
17
Frontiers in Psychology
49 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
18
eLife
5422 papers in training set
Top 56%
0.8%
19
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
20
International Journal of Public Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
21
JMIR Public Health and Surveillance
45 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.7%
22
BMC Infectious Diseases
118 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%
23
eClinicalMedicine
55 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.5%
24
Preventive Medicine
11 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.5%
25
Social Science & Medicine
15 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.5%
26
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.5%