Evaluation of the diagnostic value of YiDiXie™-SS, YiDiXie™-HS and YiDiXie™-D in esophageal cancer
Li, X.; Ge, Z.; Liao, P.; Sun, C.; Chen, W.; Li, Y.; Lin, S.; Zhang, P.; Wang, W.; Chen, S.; Wu, Y.; Zhou, H.; Li, W.; Du, J.; Zhang, F.; Lai, Y.
Show abstract
BackgroundEsophageal cancer is a serious threat to human health and causes a heavy economic burden. upper gastrointestinal imaging(UGI imaging), enhanced CT, Fecal occult blood Tumor markers such as test(FOBT) and CEA, CA125 and CA19-9 are widely used in the screening or preliminary diagnosis of esophageal cancer. However, false-positive results of UGI imaging, enhanced CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 can lead to misdiagnosis and erroneous esophagoscopy, while their false-negative results can lead to missed diagnosis and delayed treatment. It is urgent to find a convenient, economical and non-invasive diagnostic method to reduce the false positive rate and false negative rate of UGI imaging. The objective of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic value of YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie -HS and YiDiXie-D in esophageal cancer. Patients and methodsThis study included 164 subjects (malignant group, n=105; Benign group, n=59 cases). The remaining serum samples of the subjects were collected and the sensitivity and specificity of the YiDiXie-SS, YiDiXie -HS and YiDiXie-D were evaluated using the YiDiXieall-cancer detection kit. ResultsThe sensitivity of YiDiXie-SS was 99.0% (95% CI: 94.8% - 100%) and its specificity was 61.0% (95% CI: 48.3% - 72.4%). This means that YiDiXie-SS has an extremely high sensitivity and relatively high specificity in esophageal tumors.YiDiXie -HS has a sensitivity of 92.3% (95% CI: 85.7% - 96.1%) and a specificity of 86.4% (95% CI: 75.5% - 93.0%). This means that YiDiXie-HS has high sensitivity and specificity in esophageal tumors.YiDiXie-D has a sensitivity of 83.8% (95% CI: 75.6% - 89.6%) and a specificity of 93.2% (95% CI: 83.8% - 97.3%). This means that YiDiXie-D has relatively high sensitivity and very high specificity in esophageal tumors. YiDiXie-SS significantly reduced the false-positive rate of UGI imaging, CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125, CA19-9 with essentially no increase in malignancy leakage.YiDiXie-HS significantly reduced the false-negative rate of UGI imaging, CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125, CA19-9. YiDiXie-D significantly reduces the false positive rate of UGI imaging, CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125, CA19-9. YiDiXie-D significantly reduces the false negative rate of UGI imaging, CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125, CA19-9, while maintaining a high level of specificity. ConclusionYiDiXie-SS has very high sensitivity and relatively high specificity in esophageal tumors.YiDiXie-HS has high sensitivity and high specificity in esophageal tumors.YiDiXie -D has relatively high sensitivity and very high specificity in esophageal tumors. YiDiXie-SS significantly reduced the false-positive rates of UGI imaging, CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9 with essentially no increase in delayed treatment for esophageal cancer. YiDiXie -HS substantially reduced the false-negative rates of UGI imaging, CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125, and CA19-9. YiDiXie -D significantly reduces the false-positive rate of UGI imaging, CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125, CA19-9, or significantly reduces their false-negative rates while maintaining high specificity. YiDiXie tests have an important diagnostic value in esophageal cancer, and are expected to solve the problems of "high false-positive rate" and "high false-negative rate" of UGI imaging, CT, FOBT, CEA, CA125, CA19-9. Clinical trial numberChiCTR2200066840.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Machine learning based prediction of recurrence after curative resection for rectal cancer 96%
- Weakly supervised learning for multi-organ adenocarcinoma classification in whole slide images 95%
- The safety and efficacy of remimazolam tosylate combined with propofol in upper gastrointestinal endoscopy: a multicenter, randomized clinical trial 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Demarcation line determination for diagnosis of gastric cancer disease range using unsupervised machine learning in magnifying narrow-band imaging 94%
- Passive Microwave Radiometry (MWR) for diagnostics of COVID-19 lung complications in Kyrgyzstan 93%
- Detection, Isolation and Quantification of Myocardial Infarct with Four Different Histological Staining Techniques 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- The Impact of Fasting the Holy Month of Ramadan on Colorectal Cancer Patients and Two Tumor Biomarkers: A Tertiary-Care Hospital Experience 94%
- Post mortem pathological findings in COVID-19 cases: A Systematic Review 93%
- Effects of contrast-medium and vertebral measurement level on computed tomography-based body composition parameters of skeletal muscle and adipose tissue 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- DNMT family induced down-regulation of NDRG1 via DNA methylation and clinicopathological significance in gastric cancer 95%
- A machine learning approach for identification of gastrointestinal predictors for the risk of COVID-19 related hospitalization 94%
- Ursolic acid improves the bacterial community mapping of the intestinal tract in liver fibrosis mice 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Combined DeRitis ratio and alkaline phosphatase on the Prediction of Portal Vein Tumor Thrombosis in Patients with Hepatocellular Carcinoma 95%
- Effects of different environmental intervention durations on the intestinal mucosal barrier and the brain-gut axis in rats with colorectal cancer 94%
- Genetic Risk Factors for Colorectal Cancer in Multiethnic Indonesians 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.