Do editorial board members publish in their own journal? Review of editorial board members as authors in the main foot and ankle journals
Fa-Binefa, M.; Fontanellas-Fes, A.; Gonzalez Lucena, G.; Gines Cespedosa, A.; Gamba, C.
Show abstract
BackgroundScientific publications by editorial board members in their own journals raise questions about potential biases in the peer-review process. This study investigates the prevalence of self-publishing in high-impact factor foot and ankle focused journals. MethodsA review was performed of the highest impact factor foot and ankle focused journals/: Foot and Ankle International, Foot and Ankle Surgery y Journal of Foot and Ankle Surgery. In January 2023, the editorial board members were identified, and their names, roles, academic backgrounds, and regions were obtained. For each board member, the number of total published articles listed in PubMed and those for each corresponding journal over their entire history, during the last 5 years and during the last 3 years were compiled. Descriptive statistics analyses were performed using IBM SPSS Statistics v26.0. ResultsThe study included 196 editorial board members from the 3 selected journals. Editorial board members have published 1694 articles in their own journals (9.17% of all the articles published in those 3 journals). Editorial board members published 23.4% (SD 23.6) of their overall production in their affiliated journals. Of that production, 39.0% (SD 38.6) have been published in the last 5 years, considering this 5-year period as the baseline for their role on the editorial board in question. Some 10% of editorial board members have published more than 50% of their scientific production in their own affiliated journal in the last 5 years. European editors (51%) have published more in their own journal over the last 5-year period than North Americans (29%) (p<0.001). Being a surgeon is related to greater publication rates in ones own affiliated journal when compared to other specialist profiles (p=0.003). ConclusionThe publication scientific articles by editorial board members as authors in journals with which they are affiliated is a present-day phenomenon in the highest impact factor journals with a focus on the foot & ankle. Knowledge of this data could be the key to understanding the prevalence of this phenomenon, and lead to making this data more accessible.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Validation of the patient reported outcome measures tool “Catquest” in Odia language 93%
- Post mortem pathological findings in COVID-19 cases: A Systematic Review 92%
- Legal Frameworks Upholding Deceased Individuals’ Rights and Enabling the Use of Cadavers in Anatomy Education and Research: A Systematic Review 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Woman Authorship in Pre-print Versus Peer-Reviewed Oral Health-Related Publications: A Two-Year Observational Study 95%
- Investigating the Nature of Open Science Practices Across Complementary, Alternative, and Integrative Medicine Journals: An Audit 94%
- Postoperative mortality analysis of national Japanese Diagnosis Procedure Combination database with a focus on regional comparisons and changes over time 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Exploring Risk Factors for Comorbid Depression in Osteoarthritis: A Scoping Review Protocol 93%
- The Effects of Pericapsular nerve group (PENG) block on Postoperative Recovery in Elderly Patients with Hip fracture: a study protocol for randomized, parallel controlled, double-blind trial 93%
- Publishing at any cost: a cross-sectional study of the amount that medical researchers spend on open-access publishing each year 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Does Time to Theatre Affect The Ability to Achieve Fracture Reduction in Tibial Plateau Fractures? 92%
- Artificial Intelligence in laryngeal endoscopy: Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis 91%
- A Call For Better Methodological Quality Of Reviews On Using Artificial Intelligence For COVID-19 Detection In Medical Imaging – An Umbrella Systematic Review 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Beneficial influence of single-stage posterior surgery for the treatment of lumbar brucella spondylitis combined with spondylolisthesis 94%
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 92%
- Impact of early postoperative ambulation on gait recovery after hip fracture surgery: A multicenter cohort study 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.