Back

Development of a machine-learning model for therapeutic efficacy prediction of preoperative treatment for esophageal cancer using single nucleotide variants of autophagy-related genes

Miyawaki, Y.; Hirasaki, M.; Kamakura, Y.; Kawasaki, T.; Baba, Y.; Sato, T.; Yamasaki, S.; Fukushima, H.; Uranishi, K.; Makino, Y.; Sato, H.; Hamaguchi, T.

2024-09-09 gastroenterology
10.1101/2024.09.07.24313244 medRxiv
Show abstract

Neoadjuvant chemotherapy with cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil followed by radical surgery is the standard treatment for stage II and III esophageal cancers. Although, a more potent regimen comprising cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil with docetaxel, has shown superiority in overall survival compared to the cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil regimen, it involves worsening of Grade 3 or higher adverse events due to docetaxel. Based on these reports, this study aimed to construct a prognostic system for cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil regimens, particularly for locally advanced cancers, to guide selection of neoadjuvant chemotherapy. Biopsy specimens from 82 patients who underwent a cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil regimen plus radical surgery at Saitama Medical University International Medical Center between May 2012 and June 2020 were analyzed. Variants in 56 autophagy- and esophageal cancer-related genes were identified using targeted enrichment sequencing. Overall, 13 single nucleotide variants, including eight non-synonymous group single nucleotide variants predicting recurrence were identified using Fishers exact test with recurrence as a two-group event, which showed a significant difference (p < 0.05). Additionally, machine learning was used to predict recurrence using 21 features, including eight patient backgrounds. The results showed that the Naive Bayes was highly reliable with an accuracy of 0.88 and Area Under the Curve of 0.9. Thus, we constructed a machine learning model to predict recurrence in patients with esophageal cancer treated with a cisplatin + 5-fluorouracil regimen. We believe that our results will provide useful guidance for the selection of neoadjuvant adjuvant chemotherapy, including the avoidance of docetaxel.

Matching journals

The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Oncology
103 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
12.9%
2
Biomedicines
67 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
11.9%
3
Translational Oncology
21 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
10.6%
4
BMC Cancer
67 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
7.9%
5
PLOS ONE
5266 papers in training set
Top 28%
5.5%
6
Heliyon
152 papers in training set
Top 0.7%
4.3%
50% of probability mass above
7
Medicine
31 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
4.0%
8
Scientific Reports
3612 papers in training set
Top 26%
4.0%
9
International Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
10
Cancer Medicine
26 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
3.2%
11
Cancers
213 papers in training set
Top 2%
3.2%
12
The Journal of Molecular Diagnostics
39 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
2.4%
13
PeerJ
308 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.7%
14
Genomics, Proteomics & Bioinformatics
172 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.7%
15
npj Genomic Medicine
36 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.7%
16
Journal of Personalized Medicine
28 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
1.4%
17
Molecular Oncology
55 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
1.3%
18
American Journal of Gastroenterology
17 papers in training set
Top 0.3%
1.1%
19
eLife
5828 papers in training set
Top 62%
1.0%
20
Biomedicine & Pharmacotherapy
42 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
21
Annals of Translational Medicine
18 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.8%
22
Biochemistry and Biophysics Reports
30 papers in training set
Top 1%
0.8%
23
FEBS Open Bio
31 papers in training set
Top 0.9%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Immunology
638 papers in training set
Top 11%
0.6%
25
Frontiers in Medicine
120 papers in training set
Top 5%
0.6%
26
Frontiers in Genetics
230 papers in training set
Top 7%
0.6%
27
European Radiology
15 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
0.6%
28
Diagnostics
50 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.6%
29
British Journal of Cancer
49 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.6%
30
Briefings in Bioinformatics
354 papers in training set
Top 8%
0.6%