Prevalence of Problematic Papers in Non-Coding RNA Research
Lou, Y.; Zhou, Z.; Li, M.; Shen, Z.
Show abstract
This study examines the prevalence of problematic papers in the rapidly growing field of non-coding RNA (ncRNA) research. Analysis of 153,826 ncRNA papers during 2000-2023 reveals that around 1.79% have been retracted and an additional 5.68% have raised concerns on PubPeer. The number of problematic papers has steadily increased, peaking in 2019 when the concerning and retraction rates reached nearly 10.8% and 3.7%, respectively. These unreliable papers have been widely disseminated, accumulating hundreds of thousands of citations in academic literature, patents, clinical trials, and policy documents, posing a significant threat to research integrity and public health. The main issues identified include image manipulation, data falsification, fake peer reviews, and ethical lapses. The findings call for urgent, comprehensive scrutiny of ncRNA publications and broader reforms to address systemic problems driving the proliferation of problematic research.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the EMPIRE Index: A novel, value-based metric framework to measure the impact of medical publications 95%
- Reliability of citations of medRxiv preprints in articles published on COVID-19 in the world leading medical journals 95%
- Mapping the coevolution, leadership and financing of research on viral vectors, RNAi, CRSPR/Cas9 and other genomic editing technologies 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Researcher and Clinician Preferences for a Journal Transparency Tool: A Mixed-Methods Survey and Focus Group Study 93%
- Full Publication of Preprint Articles in Prevention Research: An Analysis of Publication Proportions and Results Consistency 90%
- Privacy Protection of Sexually Transmitted Infections Information from Chinese Electronic Medical Records 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- AutoVEM2: a flexible automated tool to analyze candidate key mutations and epidemic trends for virus 88%
- ccTCM: a quantitative component and compound platform for promoting the research of traditional Chinese medicine 88%
- iMDA-BN: Identification of miRNA-Disease Associations based on the Biological Network and Graph Embedding Algorithm 88%
Similar papers in this journal
- Application of Telemedicine During the Coronavirus Disease Epidemics: A Rapid Review and Meta-Analysis 89%
- Preliminary study to identify severe from moderate cases of COVID-19 using NLR&RDW-SD combination parameter 87%
- A Novel Triage Tool of Artificial Intelligence-Assisted Diagnosis Aid System for Suspected COVID-19 Pneumonia in Fever Clinics 86%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.