Back

Predicting Walking Capacity Outcomes After Moderate to High Intensity Locomotor Training in Chronic Stroke

Garrity, C.; Reisman, D. S.; Billinger, S. A.; Butera, K. A.; Boyne, P.

2024-08-26 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2024.08.24.24312537 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeModerate-to-high intensity locomotor training (M-HIT) is strongly recommended in stroke rehabilitation but outcomes are variable. This study aimed to identify baseline clinical characteristics that predict change in walking capacity following M-HIT in chronic stroke. MethodsThis analysis used data from the HIT-Stroke Trial (N=55), which involved up to 36 sessions of either moderate or high intensity locomotor training. A prespecified model assessed how well baseline motor impairment (Fugl-Meyer lower limb motor scale [FM-LL]), comfortable gait speed (CGS), and balance confidence (Activities Balance Confidence scale [ABC]), independently explain changes in 6-minute walk distance ({Delta}6MWD), while controlling for treatment group. Exploratory analysis tested additional baseline covariates using the all-possible regressions procedure. The prognostic value of each potential covariate was assessed by its average contribution to the explained variance in {Delta}6MWD ({Delta} pseudo-R2). ResultsWith the prespecified model, 8-week {Delta}6MWD was significantly associated with baseline FM-LL ({beta}=5.0 [95% CI: 1.4, 8.6]) and ABC ({beta}=0.7 [0.0, 1.4]), but not CGS ({beta}=-44.6 [-104.7, 15.6]). The exploratory analysis revealed the top 7 covariates with the highest mean {Delta} pseudo-R2 were: FM-LL, pain-limited walking duration, ABC, the use of an assistive device, fatigue, depression, and recent walking exercise history >2 days per week. ConclusionsOn average, participants with less motor impairment and higher balance confidence have greater walking capacity improvements after M-HIT in chronic stroke. Additional negative prognostic factors may include pain-limited walking duration, use of an assistive device, fatigue, depression, and recent walking exercise but these exploratory findings need to be confirmed in future studies.

Published in Journal of Neurologic Physical Therapy · not in our set (fewer than 10 published preprints to learn from) · training set

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.