Development and Validation of a Policy Tree Approach for Optimizing Intravenous Fluids in Critically Ill Patients with Sepsis and Acute Kidney Injury
Oh, W.; Takkavatakarn, K.; Kittrell, H.; Shawwa, K.; Gomez, H.; Sawant, A. S.; Tandon, P.; Kumar, G.; Sterling, M.; Hofer, I.; Chan, L.; Oropello, J.; Kohli-Seth, R.; Charney, A. W.; Kraft, M.; Kovatch, P.; Kellum, J. A.; Nadkarni, G. N.; Sakhuja, A.
Show abstract
ImportanceIntravenous (IV) fluids are cornerstone for management of acute kidney injury (AKI) after sepsis but can cause fluid overload. Restrictive fluid strategy may benefit some patients, however, identifying them is challenging. Novel causal machine learning (ML) techniques can estimate heterogenous treatments effects (HTE) of IV fluids among these patients. ObjectivesTo develop and validate causal ML framework to identify patients who benefit from restrictive fluids (<500mL fluids within 24 hours after AKI). Design, Setting and ParticipantsWe conducted a retrospective study among patients with sepsis who developed AKI within 48 hours of ICU admission. We developed a causal ML approach to estimate individualized treatment effects and guide fluid therapy. We developed the model in MIMIC-IV and externally validated in SICdb. Main Outcomes and MeasuresOur primary outcome was early AKI reversal at 24 hours. Secondary outcomes included sustained AKI reversal and major adverse kidney events by 30 days (MAKE30). Model performance to identify HTE of restrictive IV fluids was assessed using area under targeting operator characteristic curve (AUTOC), that quantifies how well a model captures HTE and compared to random forest model. ResultsCausal forest model outperformed random forest in identifying HTE of restrictive IV fluids with AUTOC 0.15 vs. -0.02 in external validation cohort. Among 1,931 patients in external validation cohort, the model recommended restrictive fluids for 68.9%. Among these, patients who received restrictive fluids demonstrated significantly higher rate of early AKI reversal (53.9% vs 33.2%, p<0.001), sustained AKI reversal (34.2% vs 18.0%, p<0.001) and lower rates of MAKE30 (17.1% vs 34.6%, p=0.003). Results were consistent in adjusted analysis. Conclusions and RelevanceCausal ML framework outperformed random forest model in identifying patients with AKI and sepsis who benefit from restrictive fluid therapy. This provides a data-driven approach for personalized fluid management and merits prospective evaluation in clinical trials. KEY POINT.O_ST_ABSQuestionC_ST_ABSCan causal machine learning (ML) identify which critically ill, septic patients with AKI benefit from a restrictive fluid management strategy? FindingsIn this retrospective cohort study, we developed and externally validated a causal-ML model to identify septic patients with AKI who would benefit from restrictive IV fluid therapy. Those who received the model-recommended restrictive IV fluids experienced significantly higher rates of early AKI reversal (53.9 % vs. 33.2 %; p<0.001) and lower rates of MAKE 30 (17.1% vs 34.6%, p=0.003). MeaningThis study demonstrates that causal ML can effectively identify septic patients with AKI who are most likely to benefit from a restrictive IV fluids strategy.
Matching journals
The top 6 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the kidney disease progression using a comprehensive patient profiling algorithm: A hybrid clustering approach 95%
- Latin American Registry of renal involvement in COVID-19 disease. The relevance of assessing proteinuria throughout the clinical course 94%
- A comparison of machine learning models versus clinical evaluation for mortality prediction in patients with sepsis 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- AKI Risk Score (AKI-RiSc): Developing an Interpretable Clinical Score for Early Identification of Acute Kidney Injury for Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department 96%
- Machine learning vs. traditional regression analysis for fluid overload prediction in the ICU 95%
- Application of physiological network mapping in the prediction of survival in critically ill patients with acute liver failure 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- A Transcriptomic Severity Metric that Predicts Clinical Outcomes in Critically Ill Surgical Sepsis Patients 91%
- A Multicenter Evaluation of Blood Purification with Seraph 100 Microbind Affinity Blood Filter for the Treatment of Severe COVID-19: A Preliminary Report 91%
- Divergence Between Net Fluid and Weight-Based Evaluation in Calculating Cumulative Fluid Balance 90%
Similar papers in this journal
- Laboratory diagnostic of acute kidney injury and its progression: risk of underdiagnosis in female and elderly patients 95%
- Evaluating the Association and Predictability of Complex Medication Regimen Scores with Clinical Outcomes Among the Critically Ill 94%
- Validation of SeptiCyte RAPID to discriminate sepsis from non-infectious systemic inflammation 92%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.