Causal relationship between gut microbiota and vulvar cancer: a two-sample bi-directional Mendelian randomization study
Chen, J.; Wang, P.; Xiao, C.; Kelaimu, K.; Zeng, Y.; Lyu, F.; Gao, X.; Li, X.; Hu, J.
Show abstract
ObjectiveRecent investigations have proposed a link between gut microbiomes (GMs) and various cancers, yet the involvement of GMs in vulvar cancer (VC) remains unclear. The objective of this study was to discover the causal association between GMs and VC and identify the GM taxa with potential effect. MethodsUtilizing Mendelian randomization (MR) with genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, we analyzed 211 GM taxa and 190 VC cases with 167,189 healthy controls. GWAS data for GM taxa were sourced from the MiBioGen consortium, and VC data were acquired from the FinnGen consortium. The main analysis used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach, complemented by weighted median, MR-Egger, weighted mode, and simple mode approaches. Sensitivity analyses included Cochranes Q-test, MR-Egger intercept test, MR-PRESSO global test, and leave-one-out analysis. ResultsFour nominally significant causal relationships were identified between GM taxa and VC. Class Betaproteobacteria [odds ratio (OR)=0.064, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.004-0.946, p=0.045], order Burkholderiales [OR=0.074, 95% CI:0.009-0.630, p=0.017], genus Intestinibacter [OR=0.073, 95% CI:0.009-0.617, p=0.016], and genus RuminococcaceaeUCG003 [OR=0.162, 95% CI:0.028-0.938, p=0.042] were linked to a lower chance of VC. The MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO global test confirmed the lack of horizontal pleiotropy (p>0.05), and leave-one-out analysis indicated result robustness. ConclusionOur findings highlight four potential causal relationships and specific intestinal flora associated with decreased VC risk, offering insights for VC prevention and treatment.
Matching journals
The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluation of DNA extraction protocols from liquid-based cytology specimens for studying cervical microbiota 95%
- MinION Sequencing of colorectal cancer tumour microbiomes - a comparison with amplicon-based and RNA-Sequencing 95%
- The urinary microbiome in association with diabetes and diabetic kidney disease: A systematic review 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- On the robustness of inference of association with the gut microbiota in stool, swab and mucosal tissue samples 95%
- Consumption of only wild foods induces large-scale, partially-persistent alterations to the gut microbiome 95%
- Manually weighted taxonomy classifiers improve species-specific rumen microbiome analysis compared to unweighted or average weighted taxonomy classifiers 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Red cabbage juice-mediated gut microbiota modulation improves intestinal epithelial homeostasis and ameliorates colitis 94%
- Aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) activation by 2,3,7,8-tetrachlorodibenzo-p-dioxin (TCDD) dose-dependently shifts the gut microbiome consistent with the progression of steatosis to steatohepatitis with fibrosis 93%
- Interaction of intestinal bacteria with human rotavirus during infection in children 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Key taxa of the gut microbiome associated with the relationship between environmental sensitivity and inflammation-related biomarkers 96%
- The Signature Microbiota Driving Rumen Function Shifts in Goat Kids Introduced Solid Diet Regimes 94%
- Microbiome signatures in a fast and slow progressing gastric cancer murine model and their contribution to gastric carcinogenesis 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Nasopharyngeal microbial communities of patients infected with SARS-COV-2 that developed COVID-19. 96%
- Digital Therapeutics Care Utilizing Genetic and Gut Microbiome Signals for the Management of Functional Gastrointestinal Disorders: Results from a Preliminary Retrospective Study 95%
- Gut Microbiome Functional and Taxonomic Diversity within an Amazonian semi-nomadic hunter-gatherer group 94%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.