Back

Causal relationship between gut microbiota and vulvar cancer: a two-sample bi-directional Mendelian randomization study

Chen, J.; Wang, P.; Xiao, C.; Kelaimu, K.; Zeng, Y.; Lyu, F.; Gao, X.; Li, X.; Hu, J.

2024-08-05 obstetrics and gynecology
10.1101/2024.08.04.24311470 medRxiv
Show abstract

ObjectiveRecent investigations have proposed a link between gut microbiomes (GMs) and various cancers, yet the involvement of GMs in vulvar cancer (VC) remains unclear. The objective of this study was to discover the causal association between GMs and VC and identify the GM taxa with potential effect. MethodsUtilizing Mendelian randomization (MR) with genome-wide association study (GWAS) summary statistics, we analyzed 211 GM taxa and 190 VC cases with 167,189 healthy controls. GWAS data for GM taxa were sourced from the MiBioGen consortium, and VC data were acquired from the FinnGen consortium. The main analysis used the inverse-variance weighted (IVW) approach, complemented by weighted median, MR-Egger, weighted mode, and simple mode approaches. Sensitivity analyses included Cochranes Q-test, MR-Egger intercept test, MR-PRESSO global test, and leave-one-out analysis. ResultsFour nominally significant causal relationships were identified between GM taxa and VC. Class Betaproteobacteria [odds ratio (OR)=0.064, 95% confidence interval (CI):0.004-0.946, p=0.045], order Burkholderiales [OR=0.074, 95% CI:0.009-0.630, p=0.017], genus Intestinibacter [OR=0.073, 95% CI:0.009-0.617, p=0.016], and genus RuminococcaceaeUCG003 [OR=0.162, 95% CI:0.028-0.938, p=0.042] were linked to a lower chance of VC. The MR-Egger intercept test and MR-PRESSO global test confirmed the lack of horizontal pleiotropy (p>0.05), and leave-one-out analysis indicated result robustness. ConclusionOur findings highlight four potential causal relationships and specific intestinal flora associated with decreased VC risk, offering insights for VC prevention and treatment.

Matching journals

The top 8 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

50% of probability mass above

"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.