Rapid review of Allied Health Professionals working in neonatal services
Bromham, N.; Batten, L.; Jarrom, D.; Gillen, E.; Hounsome, J.; Davies, J.; Tudor Edwards, R.; Cooper, A.; Edwards, A.; Lewis, R.
Show abstract
BackgroundThis review aimed to quantify the impact of allied health professionals (AHPs) embedded in neonatal services on outcomes by asking the following review questions: Q1. What is the effectiveness of neonatal services with embedded allied health professionals compared to neonatal services without embedded allied health professionals? Q2. What is the effectiveness of early interventions provided by allied health professionals in neonatal units? Research Implications and Evidence GapsThere was very little directly relevant evidence on AHPs embedded in neonatal services. Most of the evidence related to multidisciplinary team working or early interventions provided by AHPs. Few early intervention trials were from the UK, leading to uncertainty about the availability and applicability of interventions in the UK setting. Further UK-based research is needed to better understand the best way to integrate allied health professionals in neonatal services. Economic considerationsThere is no published evidence on the cost of AHPs working within neonatal units. There is marked variability in the reporting of cost estimates for neonatal care units in the UK, making the evaluation of cost implications of adopting AHP recommendations difficult. Subsequent economic evaluations could explore the Budget Impact to the NHS of increasing AHP presence in neonatal units to align with recommendations from AHP professional bodies and Royal Colleges. Funding statementHealth Technology Wales were funded for this work by the Health and Care Research Wales Evidence Centre, itself funded by Health and Care Research Wales on behalf of Welsh Government.
Matching journals
The top 4 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Mapping factors that may influence attrition and retention of midwives: a scoping review protocol 94%
- Caregiver-mediated interventions to support self-regulation among infants and young children (0-5): A protocol for a realist review 94%
- Neonatal outcomes and indirect consequences following maternal SARS-CoV-2 infection in pregnancy: A systematic review 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- COVID-19 and pregnancy: An umbrella review of clinical presentation, vertical transmission, and maternal and perinatal outcomes 92%
- Breastfeeding outcomes in late preterm infants: a multi-centre prospective cohort study 92%
- Protocol for a scoping review investigating success in research capacity building for nurses, midwives and allied health professionals 92%
Similar papers in this journal
- Evaluating the impact of an enhanced support implementation of the PReCePT (PRevention of Cerebral palsy in Pre-Term labour) quality improvement toolkit to increase the uptake of magnesium sulphate in pre-term deliveries for the prevention of neurodisabilities: study protocol for a cluster randomized controlled trial 93%
- Family-centered postnatal training and adherence to newborn care practices in district hospitals in two Indian states: A quasi-experimental intervention study 92%
- National statutory reporting: not even ticking the boxes? The quality of ‘Learning from Deaths’ reporting in Quality Accounts within the NHS in England 2017-2020 91%
Similar papers in this journal
- Electronic early notification of sepsis in hospitalized ward patients: a study protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized controlled trial 89%
- The NYCKidSeq project: study protocol for a randomized controlled trial incorporating genomics into the clinical care of diverse New York City children 89%
- Evaluating implementation of LEAPS, a youth-led early childhood care and education intervention in rural Pakistan: protocol for a stepped-wedge cluster randomized trial 89%
Similar papers in this journal
- The effect of balanced energy-protein supplementation provided to lactating women on maternal and infant outcomes: study protocol for a prospectively planned individual patient data (IPD) meta-analysis 91%
- Taxonomy of interventions at academic institutions to improve research quality 90%
- Recommendations from long-term care reports, commissions, and inquiries in Canada 89%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.