Cancer as a Novel Risk Factor for Major Adverse Cardiovascular Events in Secondary Prevention
Melchiori, R. E.; Diaz Saravia, S.; Rubio, P.; Szlaien, L.; Mourino, R.; Rizzo, M.; Flaherty, M. E.; Hita, A.
Show abstract
IntroductionThe inflammatory mechanisms of cancer can be associated with atherosclerosis development and progression. Although there is an incidence rate of cardiovascular events in secondary prevention following a first acute coronary syndrome (ACS). MethodsA retrospective study cohort study including patients who underwent a PCI for first Acute Coronary Syndrome (ACS), and without prior history of Major Cardiovascular Events (MACE) from 2008 to 2022 was analyzed. Included patients were grouped according to the absence or presence of cancer: G1 non-oncologic, and G2 oncologic (either prior or actual history). We compared the incidence rate ratio of MACE within 3 years after STEMI between groups Time-to-event analysis was conducted through proportional Cox regression analysis, estimating hazard ratio, and corresponding 95% confidence intervals (95% CI) ResultsOut of 937 patients who underwent a PCI, 787 patients were included of which 88.7% (n=698) presented without cancer. Over a median follow-up time of 45 months [IQR= 14-72], the incidence rate of MACE was 4.4 cases per 1000 patients/months of follow-up (n=173 MACE events). When comparing both groups, the incidence rate ratio of MACE was 1.9 (95% CI 1.24-2.99), significantly increased in the cancer group (P=0.0032) without showing differences in median follow-up times. Cancer was an independent predictor of MACE HR 1.84 (95% CI 1.19-2.85; P=0.006), adjusted for hypertension, dyslipidemia, diabetes, smoking history, sedentary lifestyle, obesity, age, male gender, and family history of cardiovascular disease. ConclusionsPatients with cancer represent a novel independent risk factor for MACE, even following secondary preventive therapies. These results highlight future endpoints for cardiovascular prevention and further public health interventions on this population.
Matching journals
The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Heart disease mortality in cancer survivors: A population-based study in Japan 95%
- Association between prostate cancer and myocardial infarction management and post-infarction outcomes: A Norwegian registry study 95%
- Predictors of survival in patients with ischemic stroke and active cancer: A prospective, multicenter, observational study 94%
Similar papers in this journal
- Predicting long-term prognosis after percutaneous coronary intervention in patients with acute coronary syndromes: a prospective nested case-control analysis for county-level health services 95%
- Development and validation of a cardiovascular diseases risk prediction model for Chinese males (CVDMCM) 93%
- Impact of cardiac rehabilitation and treatment compliance after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) in France, the STOP SCA+ study 92%
Similar papers in this journal
Similar papers in this journal
- The usefulness of D-dimer as a predictive marker for mortality in patients with COVID-19 hospitalized during the first wave in Italy 93%
- Survival benefit of adjuvant therapy following neoadjuvant therapy in patients with resected esophageal cancer: a retrospective cohort study 93%
- The effect of coronary revascularization treatment timing on mortality in patients with stable ischemic heart disease in British Columbia 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Temporal Variations in Ischemic and Bleeding Event Risks after Acute Coronary Syndrome during Dual Antiplatelet Therapy 95%
- Utility of the CHADS-P 2 A 2 RC score for estimating net adverse clinical events in chronic coronary syndrome patients without atrial fibrillation: insights from the CLIDAS-PCI 94%
- Psychosocial distress and health status as risk factors for ten-year major adverse cardiac events and mortality in patients with non-obstructive coronary artery disease 93%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.