Back

Prospective classification of functional dependence: Insights from machine learning and 39,927 participants in the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging

van Allen, Z. M.; Dionne, N.; Boisgontier, M. P.

2024-07-15 rehabilitation medicine and physical therapy
10.1101/2024.07.15.24310429 medRxiv
Show abstract

PurposeFunctional dependence is a multifactorial health condition affecting well-being and life expectancy. To better understand the mechanisms underlying this condition, we aimed to identify the variables that best prospectively classify adults with and without limitations in basic and instrumental activities of daily living. MethodsA filtering approach was used to select the best predictors of functional status from 4,248 candidate predictors collected in 39,927 participants aged 44 to 88 years old at baseline. Several machine learning models using the selected baseline variables (2010-2015) were compared for their ability to classify participants by functional status (dependent vs. independent) at follow up (2018-2021) on a training dataset (n=31,941) of participants from the Canadian Longitudinal Study on Aging. The best performing model was then examined on a test dataset (n=7,986) to confirm sensitivity, specificity, and accuracy. ResultsEighteen candidate baseline variables were identified as the best predictors of functional status at follow up. Logistic regression was the best performing model for classifying participants by functional status and achieved balanced accuracy of 81.9% on the test dataset. The absence of functional limitations at baseline, stronger grip strength, being free of pain and of chronic conditions, being a female, having a drivers license, and good memory were associated with greater odds functionally independence at follow-up. In contrast, older age, psychological distress, walking slowly, being retired, having one or more chronic conditions, and never going for walks were associated with greater odds of functional dependence at follow-up. ConclusionFunctional status can be best prospectively estimated by health condition, age, muscle strength, short-term memory, physical activity, psychological distress, and sex. These predictors can estimate functional status over 6 years ahead with high accuracy. This early identification of people at risk of functional dependence allows sufficient time for the implementation of interventions aiming to delay functional decline.

Matching journals

The top 5 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.

1
Frontiers in Aging
10 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
23.5%
2
PLOS ONE
4510 papers in training set
Top 23%
7.5%
3
Age and Ageing
27 papers in training set
Top 0.1%
6.7%
4
The Journals of Gerontology: Series A
25 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
6.6%
5
Scientific Reports
3102 papers in training set
Top 15%
6.6%
50% of probability mass above
6
BMJ Open
554 papers in training set
Top 4%
4.5%
7
GeroScience
97 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
4.1%
8
npj Aging
15 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
3.8%
9
Alzheimer's & Dementia: Diagnosis, Assessment & Disease Monitoring
38 papers in training set
Top 0.6%
1.9%
10
Gait & Posture
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.8%
11
The Journals of Gerontology, Series A: Biological Sciences and Medical Sciences
22 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.6%
12
Frontiers in Neurology
91 papers in training set
Top 3%
1.4%
13
International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health
124 papers in training set
Top 5%
1.4%
14
F1000Research
79 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
15
Aging
69 papers in training set
Top 2%
1.4%
16
Experimental Gerontology
11 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
1.3%
17
PLOS Medicine
98 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
18
Healthcare
16 papers in training set
Top 1%
1.0%
19
Human Brain Mapping
295 papers in training set
Top 4%
1.0%
20
Annals of Epidemiology
19 papers in training set
Top 0.5%
0.8%
21
Journal of Medical Virology
137 papers in training set
Top 4%
0.8%
22
Alzheimer's Research & Therapy
52 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.8%
23
Frontiers in Medicine
113 papers in training set
Top 6%
0.8%
24
Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience
67 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.8%
25
MethodsX
14 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
26
SSM - Population Health
17 papers in training set
Top 0.4%
0.8%
27
Journal of the American Geriatrics Society
12 papers in training set
Top 0.2%
0.8%
28
Scientific Data
174 papers in training set
Top 3%
0.7%
29
Brain and Behavior
37 papers in training set
Top 2%
0.7%
30
Contemporary Clinical Trials Communications
11 papers in training set
Top 0.8%
0.5%