Using a hybrid of artificial intelligence and template-based method in automatic item generation to create multiple-choice questions in medical education: Hybrid AIG
Kiyak, Y. S.; Kononowicz, A.
Show abstract
ObjectivesTemplate-based automatic item generation (AIG) is more efficient than traditional item writing but it still heavily relies on expert effort in model development. While non-template-based AIG, leveraging artificial intelligence (AI), offers efficiency, it faces accuracy challenges. We aimed to integrate these approaches for leading to a significant rise in efficiency for AIG without sacrificing accuracy. Material and MethodsWe proposed the Hybrid AIG method that utilizes AI to generate item models (templates) and cognitive models to combine the advantages of the two AIG approaches. The Hybrid AIG consists of seven steps. The first five steps are carried out by an expert in a customized AI environment. Following a final expert review (Step 6), the content in the template can be used for item generation through a traditional (non-AI) software (Step 7). We used two multiple-choice questions for demonstration. ResultsWe demonstrated that AI is capable of generating item models and cognitive models for AIG under the guidance of a human expert. Leveraging AI in template development has substantially reduced the time investment from five hours to less than 10 minutes, and made it significantly less challenging. ConclusionsThe Hybrid AIG method transcends the traditional template-based approach by marrying the "art" that comes from AI as a "black box" with the "science" of algorithmic generation under the oversight of expert as a "marriage registrar". It does not only capitalize on the strengths of both approaches but also mitigates their weaknesses, offering a human-AI collaboration to increase efficiency in medical education.
Matching journals
The top 3 journals account for 50% of the predicted probability mass.
Similar papers in this journal
- Large language models for generating medical examinations: systematic review 97%
- Performance of ChatGPT on Chinese National Medical Licensing Examinations: A Five-Year Examination Evaluation Study for Physicians, Pharmacists and Nurses 96%
- Medical students' perceptions towards artificial intelligence in education and practice: A multinational, multicenter cross-sectional study 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Collaborative intelligence in AI: Evaluating the performance of a council of AIs on the USMLE 95%
- Performance of Generative Pretrained Transformer on the National Medical Licensing Examination in Japan 95%
- Ethical review of clinical research with generative AI: Evaluating ChatGPT’s accuracy and reproducibility 95%
Similar papers in this journal
- Introducing the 4Ps Model of Transitioning to Distance Learning: a convergent mixed methods study conducted during the COVID-19 pandemic 94%
- Investigating the Role of AI Explanations in Lay Individuals’ Comprehension of Radiology Reports: A Metacognition Lense 93%
- Protocol For Human Evaluation of Artificial Intelligence Chatbots in Clinical Consultations 93%
Similar papers in this journal
- Medical Clinical Minds Meet Artificial Intelligence: Italian Physicians' Knowledge, Attitudes, and Concordance between Italian Physicians and AI-Generated Diagnoses. A National Cross-Sectional Study 91%
- Development and Validation of a Machine Learning Model Integrated with the Clinical Workflow for Inpatient Discharge Date Prediction 91%
- Listening to mental health crisis needs at scale: using Natural Language Processing to understand and evaluate a mental health crisis text messaging service 91%
"Similar papers" are the closest papers from that journal in the model's embedding space. They show what the match is built on, but the ranking comes mostly from a classifier over the whole training set, not from these examples alone.